Although I wrote my feelings here, I want to express not only the feelings of the second part, but also the content of the first part. The main reason is to save trouble, too lazy to write a text. Although the plots of the two films are different, why do I have to separate the two films and write them down one by one, and make myself rack my brains? Besides, I've always watched the movie and it's a lot of fun. In the two movies, everyone is my favorite. Even if I write a comment separately, it's just showing my drooling nympho, and it's not interesting. Haha, I will write it together.
Overall, I still prefer the first one. The plot of the second part is relatively thin. If there is no eldest son of the farm, Norman Qianli, who saves his father (Is there a thousand miles? Let’s put it this way), then this show will not be able to watch. But even with the support of this plot, the film is still very loose, especially the content of the second lesson, the youngest child Vincent said to the little elephant, "Although the bed is crowded, I still like to sleep with you" (to the effect, Can't remember the original) It's too simple and irresponsible to ask McPhee to remove a scab that represents the children's vices?
If you haven't watched Part 1 and watched Part 2 directly, you probably won't feel that way. After all, how new the concept of the magic babysitter is, and the method of correcting the children is commendably not the same as the first one. But since I started from the first part, of course I know that McPhee has a way to educate children, no matter what specific method she uses, she can't do without the big framework of punishing them if they don't obey, and they will lose their favorite things.
Of course, all of the above does not affect my appreciation of the film. For me, watching the movie is not just a pleasure, there are super cute children as magic weapons, of course I can win my favorite! Beauty is supreme, my favorite is the eldest son Simon in Part 1, followed by Norman in Part 2 and the younger son Vincent, and so on.
I have to mention Thomas Sangster who plays Simon, the little guy is so beautiful, but I was so addicted to watching the film that I would rather turn into a weirdo and stand on his way home and pull out a stick Sugar to lure him. I checked the information, Thomas was 15 years old when he played McPhee in the first part, but when I watched the film, I felt like I was only about 12 years old. In the scene in the snow at the end, the skin that can be broken by bombs and the crystal clear face are really like A pure little angel (Uh... Saying that Xiaotuo is Zhengtai, not a loli, but that's what I thought at the time). Born in May of the 1990s, Xiao Tuo is now 20, and I saw his muscular arms in the latest pictures. Fortunately, it's not like many Western male child stars grow up and become more tragic, and the small appearance is still so handsome.
There is also Asa Butterfield who plays Norman. Although I am not as amazed as Xiaotuo, Asa, who ran to London to meet the Lord, once put on a suit, her handsome and small body immediately made me see peach blossoms—— Tsk tsk, so handsome, another little Zhengtai with a delicate face!
As long as the movies with magic are not too brain-dead, I like them all, and these two are no exception. In the process of watching, I always feel full of hope, warmth, love and being loved. It would be really nice if it could always be like this in life.
(Finally, a shameless superfluous sentence, please ignore the pure: if my life can always be surrounded by more beautiful Zhengtai and loli, it will be perfect! Digging Kaka!)
View more about Nanny McPhee Returns reviews
