It is said that this film is very weak, and the box office is not good. Personally, I think it is mainly because the opening is not good. It can survive half of it. Overall, it is ok.
I just read the other comments. It turns out that this is another work that has been reworked. I haven't seen the three musketeers, so I don't feel repulsive, but the relationship between the chief guard and the queen dowager makes me very uncomfortable. Also, it's a little strange that the Guard Chief's fellow chats don't have my discomfort. Moreover, if you can change the king if you are unhappy, that would be too arrogant.
The photographer somehow managed to shoot LEO very mediocre in the first half, not because of the acting, but because of the shooting. The second half was better, LEO's eyes finally kept up with the needs of the plot. During that time, LEO seemed to specialize in such bad films, such as "Romeo and Juliet", "The Man in the Iron Mask", etc., and they all changed the original book into a mess, which was neither good-looking nor entertaining. No wonder he said it was embarrassing at that time. Expect.
View more about The Man in the Iron Mask reviews
