back to the masses

Mireya 2022-03-02 08:01:08

There are many film and television works that render same-sex love stories too beautiful or too tragic.

The close-up of the male protagonists being silent or crying is certainly moving, and it is understandable that people who play same-sex roles as straight men (such as Wang Yuzhi) use "big breakthrough" as a selling point for their acting skills.
However, fighting and killing are all white knives in and red knives out, and no one is more noble.
Compared with the unbridled slander and splash of ink, the bright and heavy makeup without any scruples is not much better.

Fortunately, Hollywood, propped up by gay black Jews, may have some discerning people. They return the identity of the same sex to the public, and put homosexuality into the sophistication and human relationship of chai, rice, oil, salt, sauce, vinegar and tea, which makes people feel that homosexuality exists in this world, and it is no big deal.

The meaning of this work, in my opinion, lies here.

Cleverly interspersed with two feelings, each of which is wonderful and intersects with each other.
It can be said to be a case comparison, or it can be said to complement each other.

But with my IQ, I only realized some of this beauty after watching the movie.

One last question: Is Avery's best friend really straight?

PS: The actor who played Ellie's sister also played an unrestricted female clown in The Good Wife, and was convicted for her words. Compared with the appearance in this film, not only the acting, but also the appearance is different.

View more about All Over the Guy reviews

Extended Reading
  • Tressa 2022-04-20 09:02:35

    The male protagonist is too handsome. The story is good, but it's too awkward

  • Fletcher 2022-04-22 07:01:53

    Subtitles suck! "Am I like man poison?" actually translated as "Am I Luo Yufeng?!" In addition, I was very excited to see Phoebe in Friends~

All Over the Guy quotes

  • [Eli's mother has just left an embarrassing message on his machine that Tom overheard]

    Eli Wyckoff: Oh my God, I'm gonna go to the bathroom now and hope to God that I can overdose on Tums, or Maalox, or pine-scented Glade.

  • Tom: Jackie would love this bear... Fuzzy Wuzzy was a bear, Fuzzy Wuzzy had no hair, Fuzzy Wuzzy wasn't very fuzzy, was he? Was he? Was he? Was he? Was he?

    Eli Wyckoff: [interrupting him] Was he, was he, WAS he!

    Tom: That's what I said

    Eli Wyckoff: No, no. You said "Was heeeee?" It's "WAS he"

    Tom: What's the difference?

    Eli Wyckoff: You're kidding, right? You just established that Fuzzy Wuzzy had no hair; why would you then ask "Was heeee?" like a question, like you didn't know if he was fuzzy or not?

    Tom: It *is* a question, I'm asking if Fuzzy is or isn't fuzzy, what is so wrong about that?

    Eli Wyckoff: It is a rhetorical question, it's supposed to be ironic! "Fuzzy Wuzzy wasn't very fuzzy... *was* he?"