title first reminded me of the Dead Poets Society. It turns out that this ending is a copy of a drawing of a tiger dog. The Lt. Colonel's last speech left me... a little messy. All the human beings who were moved by that impassioned period, don't you really think that the reason for "not selling out your friends" is a little thin? What's more, are they his friends?
I like Charlie. I've been expecting him to make a choice that catches my eye. I really hope he can really tell who is right and who is wrong in this choice. Is this prank really going too far? Are there really improper bribes by the principal and the board of directors? Are the pranksters really trying to get justice? Going to the Dead Poets Society again. Is what Dalton does really close to poetry and freedom? I'm certainly not against Tom Sawyer-esque cat-snatching pranks like the headmaster's wig, which I find cute. But you will have a tolerant and knowing laugh at Tom Sawyer's various behaviors, just as you will not condemn Quito's gag and good luck in "Life is Beautiful" for being too far from reality. A comedy by nature, you'll forgive it for any whimsy and indecent. But "Smell the Scent and Know a Woman" is not. When you face this prank, you really have to face it as a reality, you have to really judge right and wrong, and then judge your own position, instead of simply "don't betray your friends". What friend, when you were faced with firing, sat in the crowd and thanked you for getting away, instead of standing up and taking responsibility? When the lieutenant colonel yelled "Fuck you" at them, I really thought he got it right, and when he did justice to him, he hit the ball back to the principal again. The last paragraph, I admit, made me feel really suffocated.
As for George, it is said that he hides in his father's arms and eats soft rice. This...forgive me for not really understanding the logic. What did his dad do for him in the end?
I also read other movie reviews. I really disagree with the story about that "whistleblower has no sugar". Didn't get your team together? What about your own inner justice? What if, I just think they are wrong, and I need an authority like a teacher to uphold what I think is justice?
And what is Charlie's position? Where is the root of this matter? Even if it falls into a cliché, it should be a negative example by now, right? My sympathy has always been with the principal, because I disliked those three guys even more. The logic of making a judgment should not be "a bribes me so b is right". Where to where.
And as a propaganda of American culture, if it's going to show equality (students can play pranks on the principal and be forgiven), I agree. But as long as it is equal, is it right? Tocqueville disagrees, and neither do I. What about the twisting of justice and the willful ignorance of the truth? Maybe I don't understand American culture and values, but I think some things don't vary by region. So, how did this film get so many awards and nominations when the most basic values that underpin the film are based on such a thin and messy manifesto?
As for my saying that this film has no surprises, it is that as soon as I heard the roar of the Lieutenant Colonel when he appeared, I knew that this was probably a film of redemption and return. Speaking of which, I'm really getting enough, this kind of healing story is a headache once it's flooded, although it's true that I can't think of any new tricks to play. As for why I hate this set, because I'm stupid. Thinking that back then I was brainwashed by too many youth literature, movies, etc. of this type, so I confidently planned to pretend to be a savior, and this hobby has not changed until now. I don't know if it's a good thing (nonsense, of course it's a good thing, in fact I still believe it's a good thing), but sometimes you have to admit that poor people must have something to hate, and some guys definitely have him at this point It makes sense, and I definitely did it step by step... I'm sorry, I'm really full of resentment. I do not like this. Maybe it's not that hard to save a person. It's just that I didn't do it well... In the
end, the old man is quite likable. It's better to say pity than love. Look, I'm so full of Virgin's feelings by the healing system that I want to feel distressed when I see an injured old man... I hate myself like this, to be honest.
Maybe I'm asking too much for this place. But I always felt that the director failed to create a lieutenant colonel he wanted to create. The axe marks are too heavy, making people feel that they are seeking sympathy and resonance everywhere. At least I want a strong old man who can make people feel soft and agitated naturally, instead of the director putting in a signpost and telling you that this place you have to be moved euphemistically. A good storyteller should guide the audience without making the audience aware of the guide's presence. Best of all, the audience can be spread out in every direction, and everyone is fascinated by what they have found.
I've been watching a small grasshopper crawling around the coiled charging cable all the time. It's almost Sisyphus. I don't know if it is enjoying it, or it has never realized that it is taking a circular path.
Some time ago, I proudly made a Charlie-like choice. It is full of heart: I must fight to the end, and I will never compromise with the world at the first step.
However, if I really repeat it, can I afford another year of youth? Also, in the face of my mother and uncle, I dared to speak like that, even if it was my father, would I dare to persevere?
In the end, am I really brave enough?
View more about Scent of a Woman reviews
