Good movies are subjective, and good teaching materials are objective. The two are not contradictory. Classical textbooks have their outstanding points and places to create history, which can be used for learning, assimilation, and opening up ideas. This is its greatness, and the "greatness" point is very important. Furthermore, under the definition of "great", whoever talks about the meaning of "great", oh, the next wording is subjective. Furthermore, if you have enough authority and right to speak, you say that train pitting is the greatest movie, and there is nothing to refute.
It’s okay if you don’t see it as good or bad. Real movie lovers watch movies for a few more years, learn more about film theory, and learn more about film theory. Fortunately --- I have seen this in the movies, as I should. Moreover, those who can fully appreciate the film in a down-to-earth manner have disdain to refer to other people's opinions. The film values have been established long ago. It's so popular that it doesn't even get the basic enjoyment of watching movies.
The good and the bad are in your own heart, especially for classics. What you see is the most important thing. Don't let film critics, school teachers, so-called authorities hold a chalk circle and tell you what is good. After watching the movie, it's your movie, don't be too serious, don't engage in worship. There are many movie attributes, and there are many entry points for commenting on a movie. How can you agree with everyone's point of view? How can you know where others are from?
As an ordinary viewer, I will watch it for the second time today, and will not watch it again for the third time. I haven't finished watching the battleship Potemkin half a time, and I won't watch it again.
View more about Citizen Kane reviews
