A lot of people say that there is no brain spray, it is all because of Fang Zuming's reasons for giving bad reviews, sorry for the rest of the crew. Then I'll write why I don't talk about this stuff, the movie still doesn't pass. And how the whole crew is perfunctory and lazy, and looks down on the audience, to make it like this. A poster before we start:
Well, count six people in total. So, this poster may be paying tribute to the gourd baby. Fang Zuming is the invisible and important six baby. Too long to read the version: If you don't count Liuwa, the movie also fails. The whole movie is too perfunctory. The director, the set, the writers and some of the actors perfunctory to the bone. It is troublesome to make money and gain reputation. The narrative uses the "subtitle" method in the composition; the editing is so broken that not a single shot can last for 10 seconds in the first hour; the useless scenes, broken bridges and even the useless characters grab a hand; where the plot is unreasonable and naive, the screenwriter also Never try to make up. one. The perfunctory Hong Kong and Taiwan actors include several background board Hong Kong and Taiwan actors of classmate Wang Dalu, and their lines are very small. In addition to shouting the word "dry", it's basically the phrase "fry the bridge". After I got the script, I took 10 minutes every day and said it 20 times, and the accent problem of these two sentences could not be alleviated. Taiwan Ba Lu Yi speaks, it really wants more dramas and more dramas. I really can't see them making any effort, or trying to put in the slightest effort. You may think that if you look good, you don't need any acting skills and professional qualities. two. Perfunctory director I am looking forward to the director. After all, "Saving Mr. My" is not bad. But this time it was really chilling and perfunctory all the time. The most obvious, lazy tube narrative. Can't tell what to do? It's okay, the subtitle will solve it. We are all too familiar with subtitles. It is very easy to write essays. Arguments and materials are classified and stacked, and there is no need to consider the connection and succession between each piece. This saves trouble, but the overall sense and narrative rhythm are off the hook. In addition, I don't know if you have noticed, he doesn't even want to use a little moving lens, basically every lens is a fixed lens, and he doesn't want to use a little far lens, basically all close-up lenses. The camera is fixed and the characters are not moving, so it must be very boring to shoot. What should I do, the lens is flickering. Most of the shots last for four or five seconds, which is faster than the face-changing of Sichuan Opera. In a talk scene that lasted for five minutes, I didn't understand the station relationship of these people when I saw the next scene; in all the scenes on the train, I couldn't understand the structure of the train and where the characters were in the car. There are a few parts of the train that I don't understand. So you will see that the characters don't move around a lot, and even when Jackie Chan is beaten, be careful not to fall out of the scope of the camera. The beating is even more pitiful, only the hands are in the camera. Certain retrospective scenes, with animation instead of filming, are also OK. But the sad part is cool, and the cheerful part is warm. It's easy to adjust. The bright and splendid color matching of the Eighth Route Army's death one after another is really amazing. Also, admit it, all the fight scenes must be dominated by Jackie Chan, the director does not how to manage. The use of lenses and shooting styles in these places are distinctive and out of tune with the director's part. three. The perfunctory set I thought about the set that I thought would not make the scene so new, the market was so lively, and the stove at the widow's house wouldn't be full of coal. When I watched it, I was thinking, if I were a foreign audience, and I was not so familiar with or had no deep feelings about the Japanese invasion of China, how would I see this film. Quite frankly, the Chinese under Japanese control did not have a miserable life. The Japanese did not kill a single person nor sentenced a single person in a lawful manner; they were a bit cute when they failed a caesarean section. On the contrary, the Flying Tigers came up to robbery, and their faces were still very rigid. A better foreign audience will associate Robin Hood, while a lesser one might not necessarily see it that way. A deep shiver. Some classmates will object, saying that it is for us to see and care about them. So, I would like to ask, a movie related to the theme of disasters in major countries in the world, but it does not resonate in the slightest of others. Isn't that our self-intoxication and self-exaltation? How low the tone is. Four. I don't want to mention how much the perfunctory screenwriters and characters set up the plot of this script, and how pitiful the rationality is. Using stupidity and ugliness to make jokes, I don't want to mention the non-main characters of the Flying Tigers who are all set boards. I really can't see at all that the widow and the captain are in love, and I can't see that the captain and his daughter are father and daughter. When Mr. Xu Fan looked at Jackie Chan, his eyes were filled with reluctance, anticipation, resentment, and understanding; on the other hand, Jackie Chan looked like he was raising a junior to Mrs. Xu Fan, and he didn't even give eye contact. The widow in the back may also be discouraged. When the widow delivers the cake, don't care what she thinks. When she sees the lover in the cage who might be shot, is there no anxiety and fear? At least make eye contact. After I was sent home, I sat on the threshold, watched the donkey with my daughter, and listened to the fate of the people. The daughter and the father have no interaction, and it is embarrassing even when they hug each other. The Zaozhuang stationmaster played by Mr. Nawei is the most flesh-and-blood. He is a Japanese traitor, wagging his tail like a happy dog and bowing his knees to the Japanese; but he turns a blind eye to the Flying Tigers, tries to warn the widow in times of crisis, and covers the protagonist in the reeds. He is slick in accidents, but attaches great importance to love and righteousness. He succumbs to material things as a lackey. He is weak and easy to compromise, but his actions are really towards his fellow citizens. How will this character end? No one will save him, he has no way to survive, and even the screenwriter and the audience quickly forget him. Not counting Liuwa's deception, I only give two points, one point One point for Wang Kai and one point for Neville. All other prevarications and perfunctory, please be conscientious first.
This is not a play, this is a collection of sketches worn by the clues of the bombing bridge.
Who else told me, this 3D in addition to that shell, what is the use. Ps: When I was a child, a good aunt in the neighborhood was hacked to death by her son because she didn't give money for drugs. These things are so far away from many people that they may not care, but there are also many people who have heard of, experienced and even are suffering from it. I think it's their right to reject a drug addict. Not to mention the propaganda period and posters are deceiving.
Besides, I have no objection to drug addicts getting a new life. But don't do it in occupations such as soldiers, teachers, doctors, police officers, and public figures. Ps2: You can have comedy and cheerful war movies, but let's not use the Spring Festival Gala for laughing fruit. "Escape from the Tiger's Mouth" is a qualified film of the same type, although it is also a bit flawed, the flaws are not concealed.
Update ps3: me! No! want! begging! shoot! become! just! drama! Can some trolls do reading comprehension? To sum up my opinion again: Don't write the Japanese as fools, let us win by wisdom, move the camera, add snacks to the narrative, don't play with accents, stand up the characters, and kick Fang Liuwa out. In this way, the laughter will not be lost, and I will also give a five-star review, right?
ps4: If you don't believe that there are problems with character characterization, let's play a game.
Say the name in Jackie Chan's play in three seconds. 3, 2, 1.
Say the name in Fang Liuwa's play in three seconds. 3, 2, 1.
Say the name in Taotao's play in three seconds. 3, 2, 1.
hehe.
________________
Off topic:
You are welcome to reason in the comment area. If you mention your views, let's discuss it. If you are right, I will listen to it and accept it. Thank you very much. You are also welcome to spray directly, and I will spray it back directly.
The only things I hate in my work life are yin and yang people. If there is that kind of fairy or fairy who likes to talk with a lot of contortions, turns around in one sentence, and often "yo, yo, I compliment you, why are you so careful", thank you from afar.
If we have different views, we should either exchange ideas, accept each other's corrections and gain growth; or should we recognize the diversity of consciousness and preferences, respect each other, and be harmonious and different.
Don't show that the fairy is much smarter than you, the fairy is better than you, the fairy is just fooling you, the fairy has nothing to say with you stupid thing. Ugly, thanks.
The fairies and fairies who hit the gun are welcome to join my blacklist. And sincerely hope that all good people will not encounter this kind of blue pond in real life.
View more about Railroad Tigers reviews
