After enjoying the special treatment of Dolby Atmos at midnight, I found that several friends who watched "Interstellar Discovery" made a similar exclamation for a one-person exclusive movie theater-it seems that this year's best movie-watching experience is this movie. Ironically, the initial score of "Interstellar Exploration" was just over six points. After the film was released, there were not many people who watched it. This way, for those of us who have been playing for a few days or a few days late to enter the movie theater, we provided a VIP treatment of a private room (anyway, there may be fewer scheduled films these days. ).
Why should it be emphasized that one person booked the venue?
In the movie, Pete is almost alone enjoying absolute loneliness from beginning to end, a cold-hearted astronaut who has a tired face, doesn't talk much, and his heart rate has never changed, a descendant of a heroic astronaut. When Pete is in the spaceship heading to Neptune, you realize that you are alone in the cinema, and suddenly you realize that everyone is doing the same lonely thing. He wants to go home, and after watching the movie, you also want to go home.
However, I like this film, and it seems that I can't get points from the package treatment. In fact, after watching "Interstellar Exploration", I once wanted to give it five stars. I feel puzzled, obviously not even James Gray's film was too fancy before (he used to be shortlisted in the Cannes competition for a few years).
After calming down for a while, I found that "Interstellar Exploration" had a lot of deductions, but I would not deny it completely like some extreme movie fans. Just as some people would think that Nolan's "Interstellar" is not only not hard, but also important. The core is too soft.
I was most disappointed. When the word came out, the word that followed it was nuclear bomb. From watching "Independence Day" to "Iron Man" bombing aliens, I don't know why, the level of technology has developed, even in the world of superheroes, nuclear bombs seem to be eating all over the universe, which makes me feel very wrong. I don't even care about being able to fly to Neptune in 79 days, or being impressed by the outer atmosphere space elevator that opened the article. However, as soon as I heard about the nuclear bomb, I felt that the problem with the movie was not conservative, but the director seemed to be suddenly hit by dimensionality reduction. In the dramatic conflict between the nuclear bomb destroying Lima plan and Pete's going to find his father, "Interstellar Exploration" seems to have to do so. And there are many rumors that this is not the director's original intention. For the producer, taking such a big battle to tell a science fiction film about such an inner world is indeed suicidal.
What impresses "Interstellar Exploration" are those conversations that took place in the space of space. You know, space is a vacuum environment. In ordinary movies, in order to ensure that the audience can still hear, they are still clear and standard. Not only inside the spacecraft, even between the aircraft, there are standard machine pronunciations like HAL, or the words are rounded. A female voice with no emotions. But the electromagnetic wave communication of this film is basically similar to bad signal, poor connection, and low-frequency noise. Soon you will understand that they are whispers to match the protagonist's character creation. There is also the helmet of the space suit, which is very eye-catching. It shows the light and shade of half of the human face and the changes in the shape of the light spot, otherwise it reflects the entire universe, like a heart mirror.
I tried to extend it as a personal problem, which was considered a bit of a rush problem. It is the astronauts who seem to deal with the big heart calmly, they will be suddenly shot to death by the waves coming from them during the long space travel. Look, what the movie wants to say is still a psychological problem.
No one knows how long human beings will stay in space and will eventually be killed by loneliness and fall into madness. It may be a yearning for the earth and home, or it may be alienated into animal beasts, no one knows-because humans at this stage have not landed on the moon for decades, and the Mars manned plan has not yet been realized.
In the movie, repeated psychological checks make the protagonist seem to be in a space prison. What I enjoy most is definitely the different forms of space travel, one after another. Pete started from the ground, went to the near-space elevator, set off for the moon base, went to the back of the moon, went to Mars, and then made a way to the orbit of Neptune, trying to bring his father back. It doesn't matter even if it's murmured inwardly throughout the text. I don't know how everyone understands this story.
It is that even if human beings leave the earth in the future, they will always believe that there is still a home on the earth. Pete's first sentence on the moon was also a complaint. It does not represent a new hope, but another copy of the earth. Or, like his father, home is on a long wandering road. Once he set out to explore, he never looked back—even if his son stood in front of him, he would say that he had never fulfilled the responsibilities of a husband and father. Two completely contradictory arguments, which one is James Gray willing to share? At the end of "Interstellar Exploration", I have a certain degree of doubt, as if the plot story was suddenly cut off and replaced by an old nuclear bomb. All the problems have been temporarily resolved. Under the trend of advancing into the new space race, "Interstellar Exploration" did not even step out of the solar system, so it retreated. Anxiously declare to the movie audience that humans are the loneliest intelligent creatures in the universe (including another animalistic drama that jumps out of primates to kill in space, reminding the absurd existence of humans).
Generally speaking, I am enjoying this movie, even if I know that they are made by green screen and Pete's close-up face, so I don’t bother to find bugs in such a movie? I'm just fascinated by the fact that one person monopolizes the big screen of the movie theater.
I just like space travel. No matter what purpose they set out.
The panoramic sound of a person's midnight scene, the air is filled with the undiminished smell of formaldehyde. I told myself that I like this movie.
It is a good movie that can really realize audio-visual enjoyment, and it belongs to the kind of big screen in movie theaters.
View more about Ad Astra reviews
