This film seems to let a lot of people break their defenses and start to give low scores in annoyance. The film does have some minor problems, such as a little procrastination in the rhythm in the early stage, and the heroine staying in the status quo hesitantly for too long, but it will never be lower than one point. Perhaps thanks to the all-female creative lineup, the film's large number of sexual intercourse scenes and the negotiation before intercourse are very delicate and profound. It is really memorable after watching it, and the final shocking reversal also successfully saved the film's structure and depth of content.
The reason why many people break the defense and give low scores or even directly comment on scolding mothers, maybe it has a lot to do with the direct discussion of the most undiscussed thing in male society-the size of the cow. When men get together, they will brag about how big I am, and some will brag about how strong their sexuality is, but this kind of comparison in the air where everyone is 18cm is obviously not a match for Phyllis. A real discussion of size. And this film is unprecedented, directly letting the jealous heroine and husband follow the ex-boyfriend, peeping at the ex-boyfriend's shocking bully in the bathroom, and slapped this scene on the screen without coding or concealing it. . After watching Niu Niu, there must be many people like the heroine and husband, who shook their heads helplessly and desperately and turned their faces away, and there was still some anger in their hearts that had nowhere to express.
The size of the cow, and the male sexuality involved in the size of the cow, seem to be the most taboo elements that directly determine male identity in a patriarchal society. The denial of cow size and sexuality is also directly interpreted as a mockery and denial of male identity. Here, the heroine's husband in the play empathizes with some of the male audience outside the play and is in tune. The female protagonist just misses the orgasm provided by her ex-boyfriend in her diary and in her heart that her husband did not give, which constitutes a denial of the size and ability of the female protagonist and her husband, and shakes his perfect middle class to outsiders. Being a successful and good man made him almost runaway on the spot, and also caused the male audience outside the play to start breaking defenses one by one.
This scene in the play also completely exposes the other side of the heroine's husband who seems to be a good man - a narcissist who is intoxicated with his own bull. Of course, Niuzi has transcended the pure material organ here, and has risen to a more abstract level - Phileas. Just like a gigantic bull, the inexhaustible bull symbolizes absolute masculinity and victory in a patriarchal society. Concepts such as power, money, status, success, and a happy family life constitute Phyllis—an abstract bull, a symbol of narcissistic men who flaunt their masculinity and successful status in a patriarchal society. The heroine husband is a successful white-collar worker from Morgan Stanley. He is highly praised in the workplace. His morals are very noble. He provides the family with a very rich material life. The problem of sex life is simply perfect. Because of this, many people, especially many male viewers, began to feel extremely dissatisfied with the choice of the heroine, who wanted and wanted, and thought it was a betrayal and greed for such a perfect man as her husband.
However, I would like to add a radical example here: studies have shown that the average life expectancy of slave blacks in the pre-Civil War South was longer than that of freed blacks in the north. This was because slave owners would give black slaves better food and housing conditions than poor free blacks in order to take full advantage of blacks who were regarded as livestock and property. But does this prove that southern slave owners were more prominent racial egalitarians than northern whites? Can this seemingly beautiful data really reflect the dire situation of black people in the South?
In the same way, although the female owner is much better than the southern slave owner, here, I want to put forward a very radical point: for the female owner, the female owner is like the high-end refrigerator in his mansion. Item used to engorgement of one's own phallus. Looking back, in the process of the heroine and her husband's love to marriage, although the process of love was perfect and smooth, there was a very hidden problem in the marriage segment: from the beginning to the end, on the issue of marriage , It was the male protagonist who first showed what kind of life I want, and you are just right, so you can be my wife. That is to say, in the construction of the life picture after marriage, before the heroine had time to participate and put forward her own opinions and suggestions, she was coerced by her husband to join in and gave birth to two children. Direct evidence for this assertion comes from the scene where the two of them drive together to see the house: the heroine's husband drives to the mansion he bought in the outskirts of Connecticut, and it is also the mansion where they will spend the long period of time until the end of the show. , it is here that he states his vision for his future married life, and this house is the embodiment of this vision, and the heroine agrees a little excitedly and a little overwhelmed (considering that she is still staying in front of In the shock after the brutal breakup of her boyfriend, this is also helpless). Just like that, the heroine was moved into this house like a newly bought high-end refrigerator, and became a necessary embellishment of her husband's fat phallus and successful identity.
Of course, commenting on a person still has to be done without hesitation. Whether the heroine's husband fell in love with the heroine and gave her a near-perfect family life to satisfy his inflated narcissism and the fat phallus, or did it because of other motives, if there is no later birth of the heroine herself Dissatisfaction and conflict, such as assuming that the heroine completely forgets her ex-boyfriend as other wives persuaded, then this marriage may indeed be said to be extremely happy. But the problem is precisely because the heroine's husband not only read the heroine's diary arrogantly, but also showed an almost out of control when he found that he could not realize the memories and desires in the heroine's diary and endangered his image as a successful man. fury. This invasion of privacy, the neglect and denial of the female lead's desires and demands, has become a clear patriarchal dictatorship, and it has completely exposed his narcissism and love for the female lead. Who is the main and who is the second desired mental outlook. However, there are many viewers who completely ignore the huge problem of the heroine's husband, and only focus on the possibility of the heroine forgetting the past as I mentioned above, and instead pass the guilt of the heroine's husband to the heroine. The lack of duty and honesty constitutes an accusation against the victim.
Therefore, at the end of the play, the heroine and her husband finally recovered to a certain extent their original husband and wife relationship under external stimulation and conflict, but this restoration is just the heroine's return to a high-end refrigerator and her success in decorating her husband. As a man, he took the position of a tool that he used to engulf his own Phallus. It's just that this time, with the relatively false compensation of the freedom to go back to study for a PhD, the female protagonist's own desires and demands are still avoided. That's why, a short speech by the female protagonist's best friend can directly break this false restoration and lead to a very radical and revolutionary ending reversal. Many people wishful thinking regretted that the relationship repaired in the back market turned into a reversal. In fact, they did not realize the hypocrisy and fragility of this kind of repair. And by tearing apart this kind of hypocritical and fragile repair that is very common in women's married life, the play realizes the complete denial and farewell to the marriage relationship in a patriarchal society, and unswervingly connects women's desires with women's desires. Appeal, proudly and flamboyantly elevated to a position that is not inferior to her husband's narcissism complex and self-satisfaction.
It can be said that the show has been uncompromising and unhesitating from the very beginning. It is precisely because from the very beginning that he decided not to harass the male-dominated society, that the most secretive and sensitive sex and bullies in the male-dominated society will be used. This kind of subject is neither vulgar nor outdated. If you want me to say, the topic of the size of the cow is still less photographed and talked about. It is time to talk about the size of the cow!
View more about Sex/Life reviews
