The strange things, consciences.

Kenyon 2022-04-03 09:01:12

The strange things, consciences.
Trouble is , what feels best isn't necessarily what works best
.
The thing is, what feels best doesn't necessarily work.

But there is a difference between negligence which is random in its effect , and a deliberateness which is far more one-sided
. Fair.

You cant't accuse someone of lying, if they genuinely believe what they're saying
.

Do you have any idea how dangerous and difficult it was?
Standing up to the enemy was arduous and uncertain and exhausting.
But they have to do it.
Only in hindsight that things get called heroic.
At the time you're just afraid.
Afraid of how things will turn out.
Can you imagine how dangerous and difficult it is?
Standing in front of the enemy is difficult, variable, and exhausting.
But they have to do it.
Only in hindsight will those things be called heroic attention.
And at that moment, you will only be filled with fear.
Fear of how things will end.

Freedom of speech means you can say whatever you want.
What you can't do is lie, and then expect not to be held accountable for it.
Not all opinions are equal and something has happen. Freedom of speech means you can say whatever you want
.
But that doesn't mean you can lie about it and expect not to be held responsible.
Not all views are created equal, some things have happened, like we said.

View more about Denial reviews

Extended Reading
  • Matilda 2022-04-09 09:01:08

    It's amazing. From a script level, it's the kind of script I don't have the ability to write at all. The power of true stories!

  • Monroe 2022-04-03 08:01:01

    Blind to the poster face, I saw the feature film and realized it wasn't Keira Knightley! The story itself is relatively small, and the female protagonist has a low sense of presence. Everyone performed in a balanced manner, which is a good group play.

Denial quotes

  • Richard Rampton: The coward threatens only where he is safe.

    [Quoting Goethe: "Der Feige droht nur, wo er sicher ist"]

  • Richard Rampton: My lord, during this trial, we have heard from Professor Evans and others of at least 25 major falsifications of history. Well, says Mr. Irving, "all historians make mistakes." But there is a difference between negligence, which is random in its effect, and a deliberateness, which is far more one-sided. All Mr. Irving's little fictions, all his tweaks of the evidence all tend in the same direction: the exculpation of Adolf Hitler. He is, to use an analogy, like the waiter who always gives the wrong change. If he is honest, we may expect sometimes his mistakes to favor the customers, sometimes himself. But Mr. Irving is the dishonest waiter. All his mistakes work in his favor. How far, if at all, Mr. Irving's Antisemitism is the cause of his Hitler apology, or vice versa, is unimportant. Whether they are taken together or individually, it is clear that they have led him to prostitute his reputation as a serious historian in favor of a bogus rehabilitation of Adolf Hitler and the dissemination of virulent Antisemitic propaganda.