It turns out that history can be so simple-watching the movie "King Arthur"

King Arthur is a very influential figure in the history of England, and I know very little about British history. Watching this film, I can feel the war and the chivalry style of ancient Europe (I always think that it is very masculine). Secondly, make up for the knowledge about King Arthur. The result was disappointing, not to mention that the scene of the war lacked both magnificent scenes and no samurai charm (not even as good as "The Kings of Heaven", which was not well-reviewed on the Internet. I found out "Brave Heart" and reviewed the scene again. The battle between England and the Soviet Union can only fall asleep), and the arthur is even more confusing to me-how did he become the king?
At the beginning of the film, Arthur, as the commander of the Roman occupation army, killed countless people in 15 years. Why did Merlin, the leader of the rebel army, always retreat to him? Armed by thousands of people, they tried every means to send the team to a leader with only 7 samurai, but I couldn’t figure it out.
Second, arthur’s last mission was to restore his freedom. How could he suddenly say to the people when he arrived at the destination? You were born free and liberated them. Why did he suddenly change? According to the movie, the mission is almost a lifetime of nine deaths. Isn't it necessary to drag on such a group of people to look for death? Fortunately, the enemy is not so good. The chasing group of draggers has never caught up. They only had a fight with 7 samurai on an ice lake and let them go back (see how Cao Cao chased Liu Bei in the south of the Yangtze River, That’s just a few surprises a day);
thirdly, Arthur and the rebels were “not in the same position”, his parents died at the hands of the rebels, and the result was easy to forget. The same is true of the pope’s student. My father killed the heroine face to face, but he didn’t even pursue it. He also inspired Arthur to say that Rome had fallen. It is estimated that he returned to Rome to subvert Rome.
Besides, the heroine was rescued from prison by arthur. She was so weak that her hand was broken with the wrong bones. However, after being chased by Arthur, she suddenly became a super soldier after arthur connected her hand bones. The bow and arrow are accurate, and the final battle is simply a female devil, as if her role is: pretend to be caught and go to jail-wait for arthur to rescue her-help arthur complete the personality transformation (inspire why arthur should fight)-seduce arthur Become his woman-bring in the rebel leader (her father) to help Arthur win the final battle-marry Arthur and make him a king arthur.
Summarizing the entire movie, I came to the conclusion that arthur became king in history: Arthur has long been a commander of the Roman army and has rich combat experience, and has united a group of professional soldiers (7 warriors). After the Roman army withdrew from Britain, Married the daughter of the leader of the rebel army and became the leader of the rebel army (it should be called the local army at that time). But is history really that simple? Anyway, no more content can be seen from the movie.

View more about King Arthur reviews