As a male loser in a male-dominated society, he does not resonate with men's and women's rights, that is, other rights. Actually, what's the difference? In the final analysis, it is a class issue, a circle issue, and an economic issue. Is there any difference between men at the bottom and women at the top, and women at the bottom facing men? Capable people, powerful people, no matter what their status, male or female, different or the same, who would dare to stop them? And, I think the root cause is the economy. The economy is the ability, that is, the measure of human value (has to be recognized). The reason why men's social status is stronger than women's is that their economic ability is stronger than women's. If this reason can be eliminated, there will be no such situation of unequal rights and disharmony. At the beginning of the founding of the People's Republic of China, women held up half of the sky in communism; but why did women's status decline after the reform and opening up of the market economy? The market economy, free economy, women's physical strength, and the decrease in labor capacity for two or three days before and after pregnancy have greatly reduced the value of their labor, isn't it? At the same time as their own value is reduced, they even actively depreciate themselves, resulting in the so-called peculiar pastoral feminism Culture, although the vase is beautiful, it is fragile.

In the same way, why homosexuality is not accepted by society, I think it is similar, unable to produce labor force, which is not conducive to the entire economic cycle, isn't it?

In short, I think that if this economic model doesn't change, I don't think that the whole phenomenon of human beings focusing on male and traditional relationships will not change. After all, it is deeply rooted in our economic system. If, in the future, there is a new economic model or social model, then the so-called feminist issues and LGBT issues, I think it will be solved naturally.

But now, we can only maintain the current feminist movement, LGBT movement, etc.

I support emotionally, but rationally, I am not optimistic.

View more about I Am Not an Easy Man reviews

I Am Not an Easy Man pictures

The economy is the foundation, and unless the fundamental problem is solved, there will never be a solution.

Leda 2022-03-21 09:03:04

Extended Reading

I Am Not an Easy Man short comments

Victoria 2022-04-22 07:01:48

The setting of gender replacement between men and women is interesting, but unfortunately it is not thorough enough. It should be that women have JJ, men, and men have children... Only in this way will it have a more effect of transpositional thinking. (In a male-dominated society, women should think about how difficult it is for women to live.) In addition, the storytelling is not interesting enough for me personally.
Jayde 2022-03-27 09:01:18

If you swap the social status of men and women, you can go shirtless and walk on the street talking about big breasts, muscles, and buttocks. It is women who are the mainstay of this society, because it is men who are physically disadvantaged, and there are three virtues and four virtues. , You are still sexually harassed by female bosses from time to time, so do you still think that there is already a society where men and women are equal? Do you still take it for granted that women should be patient?