As the protagonist of the movie, Mark Wahlberg obviously did not exist as the first main line, and he did not play a role in turning the tide. He did not really become the core of the movie, but became a branch existence, that is, the movie did not really exist. The existence of the main line of the selection of the right, so I randomly found a character who can demonstrate personal heroism to act as the protagonist, and as for the so-called process of the entire disaster accident, there is no real right person to narrate. John Malkovich, the only company executive who was able to cut into the core of the entire incident, apparently already exists as a villain, and it is difficult to focus on him in the story, so when the whole disaster strikes As shown in the movie, John Malkovich was sprayed with mud at the scene of the incident, while Mark Wahlberg was still in the bedroom and video chatting with his wife. As for the old movie Dylan. The stationmaster played by O’Brien is still taking a bath in the bathhouse. The determination of the location of the characters’ environment has proved the importance of the role status of the three people. When we look at it again, the movie chooses a subjective narrative. The way of expression obviously brings the plot of the movie into a realm of irreversible disaster. No one has discovered the occurrence of the disaster, no one has prevented it, and no one can see the occurrence of the disaster, but the director has one-sidedly created that the disaster is caused by the decision of the company’s top management, but when the disaster occurs It is during the quality inspection. At this time, there is a problem and it is not possible to blame who made the mistake. It is because the director used an overly subjective thinking that made us unable to see the truth.
Although the movie did not create a good and exciting story for us, the whole scene was created and scheduled just right. It was in response to that sentence, the plot was not enough to make up the scene. Yes, the director seems to have discovered this too. This created a disaster scene that is both spectacular and tragic for us. In this scene, the movie fully displays a variety of tragic and spectacular disaster spectacles. Not only does it make people feel powerless in disasters, but it also highlights the kind and great behavior in human nature that people present when facing disasters. Appearance is the truest self, and being able to choose to help others is the most beautiful thing in human nature. Therefore, after a period of time ago, after the pale expression of warm and tepid water, there was a complete explosion in the second half of the movie, and the scene was used to shock our hearts. It’s just that the heroic saving behavior of the protagonist Halo is always indispensable in this kind of disaster film. I don’t know if this kind of plot is a real story under real circumstances, but in our eyes, this kind of dog-blood saving mode is really true. It's a bit old-fashioned and too ordinary. After a vigorous scene description, I still have to watch this at the last time, which makes people feel very disappointed.
As a film adapted from real events, the pursuit is of course as true as possible. Unfortunately, for this film, the adaptation of real events is obviously just a cover, and the contrast between the adaptation of the characters in the plot is really too great. The positive character image is too positive, and the negative image is too negative. I always feel that the movie is filled with very strong personal emotions, and the accusatory description method is ready to come out. Obviously, there is no real face up to the misfortune and suffering caused by the disaster. Blindly accusing descriptions can only trigger hatred between people and dissatisfaction with corporate management. What we really discuss and reproduce is the whole incident. The reasons for the occurrence and the warnings and thoughts brought to us, and the director's approach to provoking war is quite undesirable. This is also a movie in which Mark Wahlberg has the least protagonist halo. He is dispensable in the movie. He is almost a soy sauce character, with no weight at all, except for some professional opinions on an important occasion. In the future, the rest of the movie will be almost a passerby. Not only did it fail to guide any plot content, but also excessively distracted the family scene from the main line of the movie. This kind of deliberately exaggerated and sensational character is mainly disaster-oriented. The movie seems out of place, and for Mark Wahlberg, it is at best a small role in the movie. Minutes away from the core content of the movie, it is not connected with the focus of the story. This has no sense of existence. How could the role of the movie get people's attention? This also made him the most inexistent male protagonist.
View more about Deepwater Horizon reviews
