Of the two cursive films released in 2013, the team produced the sillier one. When I said "stupid", I unintentionally praised it, as if it was just the stupid one in the two movies, but in fact it is regarded as a kind of completely abandoning treatment in all action movies, completely ignoring reality. , There is no logic, just want to show a modern version of the knight to save the princess, oh no, I'm talking about the story of saving the president.
Today I happened to be in London, and decided to watch this movie. Although I was prepared to throw my brain into the trash in advance, I was shocked by the shamelessness of this film-your first black air force, the Department of Homeland Security, and other intelligence agencies are incompetent and mentally retarded. Isn't it too kind for the second movie to blacken the hardcore allies to death?
I will say the meaning of the opening kill in the end, but the efficiency of this drone is quite incredible. In a precise bombing, none of the target characters in the center of the explosion were dead, one of them lost their legs, and the other two were alive and well. Two years later, they couldn't wait to be active on the world stage. WTF?
Besides, the protagonist’s wife is pregnant and the protagonist decides to resign. I rolled my eyes first. You action movies, if you want to explode, explode quickly, mother-in-law and mother-in-law talk about family stereotypes that seem to have lasted for centuries. Who do you expect to be touched? Can you get into the main topic?
Five minutes later, I saw the film's interpretation of "Ma Liu", and the whole person was in a state of (¯﹃¯). I took the initiative to throw my brain into the trash can, just want to watch the explosion, but the screenwriter was not enough, so I just put my brain in the trash compactor-when I watched the trailer, I was curious that the British Prime Minister returned to the West, and the world leaders went to London Attending the funeral, it is reasonable to say that the London police, MI5 and MI6 should enter a state of high alert at this time to ensure that there will be no accidents, right! However, the bad guys actually launched attacks all over the city on this day and raped the leaders of various countries. How did this happen? The screenwriter’s explanation was extremely rude-because we had so many traitors! The London Police and the Royal Guard in front of Buckingham Palace are bad guys! Then there were big explosions all over London, which happened to be some of the famous sights I visited today (the most secure locations). In the most guarded day and most vigilant areas, the bad guys can silently replace the good guys. I'm not talking about a bad person replacing a good person, but nearly 50 bad guys replacing 50 good guys (there are countless bad guys emerging from the ground behind). Just imagine, imagine the collapse of Scotland Yard and the intelligence service when they saw this clip. Then the bad guys started the ctos blackout, the screen was black, the subway was paralyzed, and even Scotland Yard was black. This seems to be a fairly simple thing, an Apple computer can do it.
When they encountered an attack comparable to 9/11 in their homeland, the British basically did nothing. The counterattack relied on remote command from the White House and improvisation by the male protagonist. Most of the time, the male protagonist took the president to take refuge in the streets of London. Motorists who always appeared on their roads sprung up like mushrooms. And on every roof in the City of London, there seems to be a guy carrying an RPG ready to shoot down the president's helicopter. With this kind of precise anticipation and the terrorist attack that there are not hundreds of people unable to come down, the British not only did not hear the wind, but the reaction is not a slow-paced problem when something happens, and it is simply mentally retarded. And the police chief came up with a wonderful note-since many of the police on the street are bad guys, let's call all our police back so that there are only bad guys left on the street. It's easy. Recognized! Then send the army to the raid, which is great! Just clap your hands. So there was a state of emergency in all of London, and there was no one on the street—I mean, except for the bad guys who were heavily armed and unstoppable, and the two male protagonists who wandered around the world and hugged their heads.
When SAS finally came out, he actually obeyed the command of the American bodyguards. In a street fight, he fought extremely stupidly. He rushed forward like a schoolboy without the brain, without shouting a few snipers to support him. In many cases, it's not that there are explosions, gun battles, or cool movies. It is very embarrassing to patronize movies with bombs, guns, single tactics, and action scenes without any level or novelty. You really didn't think about the plot, but you didn't expect that the degree of intellectual disability would interfere with your viewing of the movie. Halfway through, you were thinking, maybe their purpose is not to make an action movie, but to make a love action movie. You see, the guards of the president died tragically in various ways, and it was very convenient to just leave behind. The two male protagonists support and rescue each other, us against the world, and the little bodyguard even molested the president in the middle of "coming out"—from here on, they finally stopped concealing their intentions. When I was a hundred-year-old man, went to the core, and rescued the president who was about to die tragically at the last second, I felt that I had rolled my eyes all my life. You must know that even in a city slaughter game like Assassin's Creed, even if a person is under siege, he will lose blood even if he holds a broomstick. Why does this kind of action movie that stepped on the world's favorite (American) male lead still exists? Are we too tolerant of screenwriters who are not as powerful as third-rate doujin writers?
As for why the bad guys are so bullish, the screenwriter gave an explanation, very shameless, untrustworthy, and nonsense-MI5's head is an inner ghost, and his purpose of helping terrorists is very simple and patriotic-the government cuts my budget, so Our country will be in danger if we go down! Only an attack can allow our country to learn its lesson and continue to allocate money to us. Excuse me? In order to avoid damage to national security, let's destroy it ourselves first-are you a sword dealer or a rod maker? Not to mention this, how can a MI5 inner ghost be enough to plan such a large-scale operation? The inner ghost still relied on MI6 agents to find out whether the screenwriter misunderstood the division of labor between these two departments? MI6 is responsible for overseas intelligence work (spying), and MI5's responsibility is to find out domestic spies and terrorists. In this case, the responsibilities of the two departments overlap, so it is obviously impossible for the inner ghost to hide so many agents. And the terrorists of Bailai hidden in the rough house in the city center, Scotland Yard looked dumbfounded is also very powerful.
never mind. Thinking for a second is a waste of time.
There is also a very controversial part of this movie-often people who use drones claim that they are precisely hitting the target and avoiding collateral damage (civilian casualties), and the opening of the film is basically all places authorized by the Pentagon to bomb. It's a civilian, well, this is not a glorious incident, but this incident was justified very deliberately in the subsequent plot. In short, it shows how cruel the enemy is, killing leaders of various countries, bombing innocent citizens, and beheading the president live, while the United States has always emphasized that our enemies are murderous and damned. The United States has only done a little thing that is not honourable, but the enemy has done a big bad thing. Because of this, the little things that are not honourable can be forgiven. The enemy is damned! Probably so. At the end, they actually sent another drone to blow up the villains, seeming to be proudly (shamelessly) proclaiming: drones, great praise! Nice job!
Before the screening, there is a trailer, "Eye in the sky" starred by Helen Mirren, Alan Rickman, Tommy Lee Jones, and Alan Paul. It is about a drone operation. Great discussion of positions. After such a ethically speculative trailer, I followed such a no-brained love action movie that praised me for being a great lover. I didn't hesitate to black out my allies. I really love my ticket money.
View more about London Has Fallen reviews
