I want to talk about Kevin first. I have seen that photo many times. After the photographer became famous all over the world, he became the target of Wanfu because he didn’t save the girl. I think it’s unfair. Her life is a virtue, not an obligation, and the reporter's questioning during her visit to the photographer made me feel like she was trying to shirk her responsibility for the girl's death. Drive away the eagle, and the eagle will definitely come back in circles. If she takes the girl and takes her back to her home or any place away from the eagle, there is a high probability that she will not be able to escape the fate of starvation. If He took her with him all the time, first of all he was a photographer, a war photographer, how did he take care of her, not to mention that he himself was poor, not to mention that this girl was only the one he saw, hundreds of such Does the child have to take care of Kevin? He throws out a photo that is shocking enough, enough to break people's understanding of current life, so they will naturally be held accountable, but this responsibility must not be directed at themselves, although the famine in a large area will inevitably They have their own responsibilities, but it's easier to avoid the important ones, so I ask Kevin why he didn't save the girl. What a good and self-consistent logic, it not only declares its own justice and fraternity, but also throws the reflection and shame that it should have to the opposite person.
Some people say that the protagonist is lucky, but in fact, if he is not so brave and decisive, how can he be so lucky, even luck actually has preconditions and conditions.
It is true that some people are more likely to succeed than others, and they will be less hindered, and black journalists need to worry more about their own safety.
The morality built in crowd fanaticism is indeed terrifying.
View more about The Bang Bang Club reviews
