Tiger King short comments

Dwight 2022-03-25 09:01:12

All the villains just can't believe that these are real... Too fucked up... From the first episode to the last two episodes, it has changed from watching the fun to nothing in the heart... How is it true in the world There is a group of people who live this way and the only thing that strikes me in the whole article is Joe's self-reflection when he sees two gorillas who have been separated for 10 years The right to be close to each other for 10 years?" Alas...I don't even want to go to the zoo anymore
Guadalupe 2022-03-27 09:01:12

The deadly attraction of wild animal cubs gives people a "Tarzan" dream, and speculators use this mentality to make money. Protecting from a distance and caressing intimately for a short time, even the most noble person will imagine the latter moment. Multi-line interlaced, multiple meanings, the reality is more exciting than the movie, the beast in the heart is the most terrifying, the claws can be retracted freely, and supplemented by the mind, tongue and tears, you see, the beast is just a gorgeous picture in front of people. tapestry shawl. The three are actually control freaks, polygamist and polygamist. If Carol hadn't stood on the false moral high ground, I'd guess she would support polyandry in her heart. After all, she has also experienced N marriages. Bringing her and Joe into the Hillary-Trump relationship was brilliant and hilarious. The news outside the film finally sentenced Joe's zoo to be owned by Carol, and the tiger body was shocked, this! Break the fourth wall and complete the art.

The positions are different, but the essence is captive behavior to satisfy "selfish desires"

Mossie 2022-03-22 09:02:11

I watched people crazy Amway on Weibo. After watching it, I felt that there was something. The whole documentary focuses on the mediation of Joe and animal protectionist Carol. Joe seems to represent the evil side, but Carol’s animal protection career is also from From the beginning of the purchase, what they do is essentially the same, it’s just a different narrative position. Carol is better at using the moral high ground to influence and inspire more people to stand on her side. In the reversal of the news, the film has an in-depth analysis of human nature. At first, each of them raised tigers because of their interest, but gradually they developed their interest into a business model to make money to feed their interest. The desire is getting bigger and bigger, and there are more and more animals in captivity. Everyone has their own crimes. Joe is the craziest of them all. He is arrogant and eager to be famous, but I can't hate him. On the contrary, I can feel the charm in him. Halo. And although Carol wears the halo of an animal protector, she also keeps animals in captivity for the rest of her life, and the situation of animals has not improved. In my opinion, she is a hypocrite. But she did one good thing, and she successfully pushed for legislation to ban wild animals in captivity, and it eventually passed. Wild animals do not belong to cages at all, and the captive behavior of all lovers is actually just to satisfy their own selfish desires.

View more about Tiger King reviews

Extended Reading