This movie starts in gray and ends in gray.
Rebellion is powerless, and the rant is just to let one vent and accept reality.
The opening subtitles of the film mentioned the medical breakthroughs of mankind in the middle of the 20th century. In 1967, the life span of mankind was over one hundred. . . . . .
Very beautiful pictures, elegant British style, the beach where three people are running, and the stranded broken ship, which seems to have been seen at the end of "Shawshank's Redemption", and the color processing has produced different effects, one is bleak and helpless. One is to relive hope.
A group of lovely children, singing the school song, their immature faces, against the backdrop of the gray sweaters, looked particularly melancholy. The "No Smoking" teacher warned the children, because these children have no right to smoke or do things that harm their bodies, because the flesh that envelops their souls has never been dominated. The only reason for their existence is that his master allows him to live, and surrender their bodies when the master needs them to fulfill their mission. "No smoking" conveys not the teacher's teaching and love to the students, but the consideration of interests. The identification chain tied to my wrist and the milk I drank after getting up in the morning made me completely sick. It's completely disgusting to those who manipulate the lives of these children.
Change toys. . . . A truck of toys and the legendary horse whip. When the children heard the teacher's notice in the auditorium, they were all excited. At that moment, I was so happy. When the camera zoomed in on the desk full of toys, my heart was upset, toys with missing arms and legs, crayons of various lengths, and happy expressions on the faces of these children. Sin, how long can the school deceive these children? Wait until they step onto the operating table?
The voice of justice is small. The head teacher of the three protagonists asked a few words after the physical education class. The children quoted the teacher's words without thinking to answer. The head teacher repeatedly questioned and the students disdain. In another class, the head teacher burst into tears after a remark. No child could understand that the tears were crying for the annihilated humanity. And because of these few words, she was smoothly cleared by the mainstream of the school without any suspense. As far as the scene in the film is concerned, the person who reported the remarks of the class teacher is the student of this class.
In a blink of an eye, these children were eighteen. When they left school, perhaps for plot development needs, the three protagonists were assigned to the same place by coincidence to wait for donations. When going out for a meal, the children didn't know how to express it. The love in this film is secondary, or even useless. When Keith and Tommy heard that love can make them postpone donation, the two seemed to ignite hope and rush to the lady who was chosen to paint that year. At home, at home, they reunited with their childhood principal. The principal's words were really cruel, and there was no room for it. "We opened a gallery to see if you have character." The principal easily shattered their dreams, in her eyes Dreams. On the way back for the two of them, Tommy got out of the car and shouted in despair. Case tried to control him, but he was also sad.
Tommy, who has donated twice, recovered well, but the brutal reality brought him far more trauma than losing his organs. During the third operation, Case stood outside the observation window and watched her quietly. The only lover in his life, Tommy closed his eyes after anesthesia, and his life ended here.
The value of life, this is the question I have been asking myself after watching this movie. Is human nature glorious or dark? Is it worth sacrificing a healthy person and saving a dying person? Moreover, the sacrificed person even has the right to choose. Not at all. From the first cry after he landed, his fate was doomed. These behind-the-scenes operators acted as gods and dominated the fate of some people, reminding me of saving the Decepticons in "Transformers 2" , Tore up another Decepticon. What is this behavior? The looting of the savages is justified by the shameless.
What really scares me is not in the movie, but our current education. . . . . . . Mr. Bai Yansong said in a speech at Yale University that “the Chinese at that time had no dreams, and the leaders’ dreams were their dreams.” We are all “clones” and we live for leaders. . . . . . . . . The voice of justice is always small.
View more about Never Let Me Go reviews
