On the whole, this movie is quite interesting. Although there are flaws, the satire and plot are basically very Oak. As for the part of suspense and reasoning, the beholder sees the wise and sees the wisdom. Let's talk about the interesting parts: 1. The geographical location of the canyon is surrounded by valleys on three sides, and it has little contact with the outside world. Basically, people who come here from the outside are to avoid something, or that everyone who comes from outside has two sides. Even more multi-faceted characters, such as: professors, doctors, including the protagonist Detective 2, many people with religious colors wore crosses, I have been paying attention to it for a long time, thinking that it was a religious murder, and finally the whole town turned In order to protect someone, hahaha, guessed wrong 3. The irony is still very meaningful. A group of people come to this place where no one has come for a long time. Personally, two things are basically inseparable: reputation (status), money 4. Flashbacks in the plot, which made me think of invisible guests. At first, I suspected this doctor and paid special attention to this car. Later Finding the difference made me puzzled for a long time, but after all, there is a problem, hahaha; the plot has its ups and downs, and the overall is still a bit slower, but there is basically no urine in the whole process. It is still very interesting to see, the most interesting, It's still the female reporter and the lawyer, combined with the satirical plot, it's pretty good.
Finally, let’s talk about the reasoning of the ending. If you are open, you don’t need to care too much about who is the murderer.
But there is one thing, this doctor is definitely involved, so according to how much the doctor participates, we can say roughly:
1. The professor is the main murderer, and the final disposal of the corpse is handed over to the doctor. The two complement each other, each takes what he needs, one wants money, and the other wants people (70%)
The main reason is that it is difficult for a person to do this crime so secretly, including sending things later, guiding the police, lawyers, etc., all need help and promotion.
2. The professor has nothing to do with it at all. He was forced to go in, and when he came out, he was short of money, so he made a fortune. As he said, what he did was an accident, and the full responsibility was the doctor's promotion. (10%)
The main reason is that although the policeman has investigated so much, he still has to pay attention to the evidence. None of those pieces of evidence can point to the professor, proving that the professor still has two brushes.
3. The main killer of the doctor is the misty man, and the professor may know the situation of the misty man. He has a calculation and takes the opportunity to make a fortune. After all, he also actively promotes the plot. (20%)
The main reason: He also said that it is impossible to find the corpse, so this person is very experienced in handling corpses, so it is very likely that the doctor is the doctor, and the professor helps himself from the air (the professor may already know about the misty man, after all, the one with the postal package) Journalists are also nearby).
Personally write it blindly, you are welcome to chat together
View more about The Girl in the Fog reviews
