At the beginning, Pierrot was in the car when he sent Marianne home, and the two were almost not in the same frame: first, when the two were talking (with Pierrot as the leading questioner, it was counted as Pierrot as the main speaker), the camera focused On Marianne's side; Marianne expresses her opinion that "everyone deserves to exist and be noticed", while Pierrot listens and focuses instead on Pierrot, which is quite interesting.
But when the camera pulled the two of them into the same frame, it lost some flavor.
I have to mention that the lights flashing on the car windows, whether it was intentional or not, Marian always alternated between pink and green, while Pierrot was yellow and blue; when the two were in the same frame, The pink light shadow in the direction of Marianne turns into bright red (this estimate has no design...)
Strangely (what I didn't understand), and later Marianne and Pierrot's tacit disdain when they killed the man, and Marianne's emotion when she heard about the deaths of 115 Vietnam soldiers, came into being. For thousands of comparisons?
The genders of the paintings in the background here correspond to each other, and more of them cannot be seen... Maybe, the unreasonable association, the white dress that Marianne wore later corresponds to the painting, and Pierrot's gray suit and red car correspond to the background of the painting?
In about 20 minutes, Marianne and Pierrot got into the car and ran away in a chaotic time clip, adding to the panic and embarrassment when escaping, but it also seemed chaotic. The intertwined dialogue between the two is also confusing
After the two escaped from the gas station, Pierrot's lights were bright red and Marianne blue.
Every time the position changes, there will be a cartoon/painting symbol, a hint of the book/painting title, and it will consist of two people's alternating dialogue - tacit understanding
At around 25:30, the dialogue between the two was repeated many times, and then there were self-introductions of many passers-by characters.
There are some horrors here. It happens that a man and a woman died in a car accident, and they haven't rested yet... Pierrot emphasized the name of "Ferdinand" for the third time
He just drove the car into the sea like that? Both are crazy...
Around 1:48, bright red and pale yellow appeared many times in the picture
Here the picture is gradually zooming away, slowly shifting from Pierrot who is running to Marianne who is waiting for him to watch him. She does not seem anxious, although the short man in the suit is pointing a gun at her.
When Pierrot approaches the building where Marianne is, blue is added to the picture (or if the blue of the sea counts, when Pierrot hears Marianne's call for help)
Here Pierrot's understanding of life is very similar to the American interpretation of the movie at the beginning; and Marianne said many times: "I just want life/freedom." Perhaps the two people's attitudes towards life can be glimpsed.
In the film, red and blue are the most common and the easiest to observe. Whether it's Marianne's red dress, Pierrot's blue suit; the dynamite and Pierrot's blue on his face; the bright red of the explosion and the indifferent blue of the sea and the sky; the book and the record...it's all red and blue. And, after Pierrot found out that Marianne had killed the short suit with scissors (similar to killing the first man, who was lying on their bed), he wiped the blood from the scissors on Marianne's bright red on a colored skirt.
Pierrot blamed Marianne for betraying him instead of fleeing with him, refusing to kiss him and kissing other men, so he killed her and killed himself.
After the explosion, the two talked again (like the alternation of the two people's words used in the previous transition), and this dialogue is unreasonably reminiscent of Rimbaud's very famous poem:
"Have found-
What? --eternal.
It is the sea with the sun melted. "
Maybe Marianne is the sun and Pierrot is the sea. One yearns for freedom in the sky, radiating his own brilliance infinitely, illuminating the clouds, dimming the stars, and merging in the sea; the other rising into the sky under the sun to become a cloud, and then falling back to the earth after cooling down. There is no way to get rid of gravity, there is no way to be free, because he does not aspire to freedom. As Marianne said many times: "You are crazy." He is crazy, not after freedom; and Marianne, she is only after freedom, she only wants to live a free life.
When there was the picture book, they used paintings to transition, interspersed with dialogue between the two; when the two threw the picture book and lived a boring life by the beach, they used the diary poem written by Pierrot as the transition, and Add a shot of the two talking to the "audience".
What I remember very deeply is the dialogue that was "like a book" and "like a movie". Isn't their madman's life like a fantasy novel plot?
The man who appeared at the end of the film who matched his life with music that only he could hear was not living in a scene, he sang "Do you love me woman" and stroked their hands in different ways , is not a madman when he gets an answer he doesn't want.
Marianne shouted "I'm bored, I don't know what to do", Pierrot asked her, "What do you like". Both answered "everything", but what Marianne likes is animals, music, and a free life; what Pierrot is after is ambition...a meaningful life. Later, Marianne sang "My Lifeline" aloud, while Pierrot added "Your Buttline" in a nonchalant manner, so playful, but they also saw their different views on life.
In the movie theater, Pierrot took off his blue suit and was surrounded by fire-like red. He was watching the Vietnam War movie. The people in the movie had stories and three-dimensional lives, but who really knew them? Woolen cloth? The people who died in the movie, except Piero and Marianne, whom we know a little bit about (but only for a month), do other people who died have a full name? Pierrot said "I'm Ferdinand" ten times in the whole film. Does he also have a full name in Mary's heart?
The first time I watched it, I recorded my thoughts at the time when I watched it. When I watched it for the second time and the third time, I carefully searched those paintings to see if they could be related to the plot (I hope the author didn’t just look for it casually). painting?), and then read the lines carefully to see what else you can see. Fortunately, I don't think the movie is boring, and there is still hope after watching it a few more times.
View more about Pierrot le Fou reviews
