The Fort New York trial was really awesome. If the Tokyo trial showed the brilliance of the judges (and it was still one-sided), then the characters in the Fort New York were too rich, too thought-provoking, and there were great men who made mistakes-participated in 1919 The establishment of the Weimar constitution (the Weimar constitution is a new breakthrough in the constitution and the first for human rights), but he did things for Hitler, he knew very well that Hitler was a bad guy, he was not carried away by the short-lived victory, he knew this kind of regime Unable to last, he chose such a path for Germany, although he inevitably paid a price, and Germany inevitably paid a price. He is very sober, he is sober and sinks, and soberly sees the Germans who are red-faced and aggressive in court for their own dignity, and soberly confessed their guilt; there are prosecutors who defend their ideals and the dignity of the country - they don't say anything, and they don't give any Witness dignity, a scholar official speechlessly explained that he was afraid of the oath of Hitler's power, a man shouted in court how his mother could be a bad person, a woman was forced to cry and cry about her chastity, The purity of the feelings, one by one witnesses were ripped apart, without dignity, is this a lawyer, is this a prosecutor. The Nuremberg trials were complex and wonderful. Is there a new school of natural law, but I see that everyone is very clear that morality should be pursued, and they are clearly right and wrong. The Germans try to hide their shame, but we have to admire the brave ones among them—the real brave ones, who dare to admit their mistakes, admit their mistakes to history, admit their mistakes to themselves, and admit their mistakes to justice and truth. It was this brave man who made Germany truly stand up! !
View more about Judgment at Nuremberg reviews
