From child labor and sweatshops to other

Melyssa 2022-12-11 21:47:11

In this film, a lot of child labor and sweatshops are discussed. At first glance, it is quite reasonable. If you think about it carefully, it may not be.
Judging from the Walmart sweatshop incident, it is indeed nonsense to say that Walmart has no responsibility for the sweatshop at all, but if the responsibility lies only with a company like Walmart or Nike, it would be too rash judgment. Think about why Wal-Mart or Nike keep setting up factories overseas in order to keep costs down, while the corresponding foundries have to work longer hours or employ child labor in order to lower prices. Why this is so is due to the fierce competition on the one hand and the infinite demand for lower prices on the other. As someone who sells computers in Zhongguancun said, "If you want a computer for 45,000 yuan, I can match it for you. If you want a good computer for 1,000 or 2,000 yuan, I won't cut corners for you. How can I sell it? Is it losing money to you?" It is people's unlimited greed that creates child labor and sweatshops, and blaming only companies like Wal-Mart or Nike rather than more specific individuals is more of an escape from responsibility and self comfort. It seems that only illusory companies are guilty, and when it comes to individuals, everyone is innocent. Wrong, Everyone Is Guilty!
In this film, a lot of responsibility is simply attributed to The Corporation, but just imagine, if there are no people, where will there be a business? Almost every consumer himself works in a business, so take a look and see this at the bottom of their official website: Big Picture Media Corporation All Rights Reserved. This in itself is an irony. While criticizing the modern business, it operates as a business.
Many parts of this film are good, but the responsibility is only attributed to the management of the company or the company. Are consumers and ordinary employees of the company innocent? Consumers want better, cheaper and more convenient products, and employees want better treatment and salaries. These desires are also the source of some decisions of enterprises. And please remember that the government that advocates the need for greater power in the film does not create any wealth, and the state-owned enterprises that hope to see the situation in China are very clear to everyone. It is true that modern enterprises have more and more problems, but it is completely impossible to deny enterprises or even eliminate (private) enterprises on this basis, because there is no good substitute for enterprises. Utopia is just a utopia after all, you can dream, but don't put it into action, otherwise it will be a disaster, because fantasy always simplifies the problem.

View more about The Corporation reviews

Extended Reading

The Corporation quotes

  • Noam Chomsky: It's a fair assumption that every human being, real human beings, flesh and blood ones, not corporations, but every flesh and blood human being is a moral person. You know, we've got the same genes, we're more or less the same, but our nature, the nature of humans, allows all kinds of behaviour. I mean, every one of us under some circumstances could be a gas chamber attendant and a saint.

    Sam Gibara: No job, in my experience with Goodyear, has been as frustrating as the CEO job. Because even though the perception is that you have absolute power to do whatever you want, the reality is you don't have that power, and sometimes, if you had really a free hand, if you really did what you wanted to do that suits you personal thoughts and you're personal priorities, you'd act differently. But as a CEO you cannot do that. Layoffs have become so widespread that people tend to believe that CEOs make these decisions without any consideration to the human implications of their decisions. It is never a decision that any CEO makes lightly. It is a tough decision. But it is the consequence of modern capitalism.

    Noam Chomsky: When you look at a corporation, just like when you look at a slave owner, you want to distinguish between the insitution and the individual. So slavery, for example, or other forms of tyranny, are inherently monstrous, but the individuals participating in them may be the nicest guys you could imagine. Benevolent, friendly, nice to their children, even nice to their slaves, caring about other people. I mean, as individuals they may be anything. In their institutional role they're monsters because the institution is monstrous. The same is true here. So an individual CEO, let's say, may really care about the environment and, in fact, since they have such extraordinary resources, they can even devote some of their resources to that without violating their responsibility to be totally inhuman.

    Narrator: Which is thy, as the Moody-Stuarts serve tea to protestors, Shell Nigeria can flare unrivalled amounts of gas, making it one of the world's single worst sources of pollution. And all the professed concerns about the environment do not spare Ken Saro Wiwa and 8 other activists from being hanged for opposing Shell's environmental practices in the Niger Delta.

  • Vandana Shiva: A corporation is not a person. It doesn't think. People in it think and for them it is legitimate to create terminator technology, so that farmers are not able to save their seeds. Seeds that will destroy themselves through a suicide gene. Seeds that are designed to only produce crop in one season. You really need to have a brutal mind. It's a war against evolution to even think in those terms. But quite clearly profifs are so much higher in their minds.