about me

Kaleigh 2022-03-23 09:01:58

I watched a movie yesterday and didn't understand it - "The Revolver", and I watched it twice today. To be honest, it was quite tangled, but he had already caused me to think a lot, although I still didn't understand the essence, But in the three times I read it, I have some new discoveries every time. First of all, let me introduce the plot. I watched this movie entirely for Jason Statham (the second best actor in my mind), I never thought he would put out such a deep movie~, the plot is probably Stan Sen was imprisoned for seven years, and next door were a world-class fraud master and a world-class chess master. They were doing nothing else in prison, just studying world-class tricks and world-class chess games. He communicated in the way of books and wrote his research on the left page of the book, so Statham also benefited a lot from it, but he thought he was very smart and they were far from the same level. The two people next door, After the research, they escaped from prison together. After two years, Statham was released from prison. With their help, he defeated his opponent and completed his sublimation. What I want to share today is the understanding of "I". what am I? Before watching this film, I thought it was a very hypocritical question, because I thought "I" was me, there was no "what is me?" But now I really find that I don't understand "I". "I" is composed of entity and personality, and entity constitutes the material level, then personality constitutes the human spiritual level. The physical me is my body, my organs, the entity still exists after a person dies, but the spirit is no longer there, what is immortal is bullshit, only what is passed down is eternal, but that is no longer "I", that It is a replica of someone else, a replica of the spirit. Well, I have nothing to say about the entity. I hope everyone eats and sleeps on time, and treats their entities well. So what is "I" and what is my spiritual self? I am composed of the id, ego, and superego (the id is the original self, which refers to the original self, and contains the basic desires, impulses and vitality required for survival. The id is the source of all psychological energy, and the id is based on the principle of pleasure. Acting, it ignores social morals and external norms of behavior, its only requirement is to obtain pleasure and avoid pain, the goal of the id is to seek individual comfort, survival and reproduction, it is unconscious and not affected by the individual. be aware. The ego refers to the "self," the conscious part of the self that performs thinking, feeling, judgment, or memory. The function of the ego is to seek the satisfaction of the "I" impulses, while at the same time protecting the entire organism from harm. It follows the The "Principle of Reality" serves me. The superego is the ideal part of the personality structure. It is formed by the internalization of moral norms and values ​​of the social and cultural environment in the process of individual growth. Its function is mainly to supervise, criticize and control their own behavior. I am characterized by the pursuit of perfection, so it is unreal like the id, and the superego is mostly unconscious. The superego requires the ego to satisfy the id in a socially acceptable way, and it follows "moral principles") , just what Freud said. Then the final form of human beings is the me that everyone can see, that is, the ego, which is only the result obtained through the discussion of Freud's ego's psychological defense mechanism. Simply put, it is like "id", "ego" and "superego" The "outer world" is four people, and the ego is simultaneously subject to three strict masters, the outer world, the superego and the id, and it is not easy to reconcile their demands and needs with each other. The ego is surrounded in the center, terrorized by three dangers. If it can't stand its stress, it develops anxiety, and anxiety makes itself very uncomfortable. In order to avoid anxiety, the ego develops a function that enables it to mediate the conflict between the three masters and to moderate the threat of the three dangers to it. In short, making reality acceptable to the external world, acceptable to the superego, and satisfying to the id. This function is the psychological defense mechanism. However, the ego pays a high price in adopting the psychological defense mechanism, which consumes a lot of energy. The defense mechanism is a childlike reaction that occurs unconsciously, which may hinder the development of realistic behaviors. For the individual, not all defense mechanisms are employed, but only some of them are employed selectively, and these mechanisms may become fixed in the ego. That is to say, in our life, there will always be the id and the superego that restrict our behavior. They both act on the ego together. For example, we often say that two villains are fighting, and the superego is acting as justice. On the one hand, the id plays the evil side, because the id wants to satisfy the instincts of human beings, and the superego represents morality. There are many conflicts between morality and instinct in our real society, so the dynamic balance is generated. The ego is what we finally show everyone to see. Only by understanding the fundamentals of an object can we understand it. From understanding that understanding is the fundamental way to "obtain", then everyone now understands what "I" is, and we need to understand it now. id, ego, superego , You can verify it in your daily life to see if these three parts will be dynamically balanced in your life? If you feel anxious, is that you are intimidated by a kind of your enemy, your enemy? Yes, it's you, there's a quote in the film that really impressed me. The greater enemy will hide in the last place you would ever look. This is the words of Julius Caesar, the strongest enemy is myself, in Freud's eyes is the self-defeating id and superego together, in my In my eyes, that is how to deal with these three relationships so that I will no longer be threatened, no longer anxious, and then I will be happy. You friends are close, but your enemies are closer. Sometimes when I can't figure out some things, I always feel like I've lived a life of ignorance. This kind of life is really disgusting. There are also times when I can’t think about one or two things for a long time, I can’t eat for a long time, and I can’t sleep well. I’m going to have such experiences. Before I figured out these things, I was like this too, and it was very uncomfortable. But after being tortured for so long, I think it's better to ask myself "how to solve it" than to ask myself "what's wrong" because the nature of the matter is that if we are "in this mountain", we cannot see through it at a glance. If we try to get out of this mountain, naturally Just know "what's wrong". So I think "how to solve" is the key, so how to solve it? This is due to a concept that involves us, that is, self and group self. I listened to my mentor, Mr. Qu Yang, to introduce this point of view. I am now learning to sell and tell me what I know. "I" is made up of the group I, that is: I am not an individual but a group. The me who is typing and the me who is talking are not the same me, nor the me of one second and the me of the next. Why do you say that? From a scientific point of view, our body is composed of countless cells, and cells are always changing and metabolizing themselves. When I typed these four words, the cells had already changed again, and some cells had been born. By definition, it's not me anymore. When I first heard this theory, I couldn't accept it. I even felt terrible. I even felt that I was a "split personality"... But from an emotional point of view, the frustrated me is the past me, the one I am in science The past is dead, the current me is the current me, why should the current me punish myself for the fault of the frustrated me who has died? So why should we dwell on the facts of the past instead of grasping the present? I think this is the key to our "how to solve" problem, which is the mindset. Got hit? It's ok. Can't solve it? It's ok. Happiness is also a day, pain is also a day, pay attention, this me has nothing to do with the dead me, this is the exchange of memories. We also have to live, I think your choice will be the same as mine~ This is a little superficial understanding of "me" I watched this film, this film is really good, and my understanding of money is also It's quite deep, at least I haven't fully understood it yet. If anyone understands this video, please tell me about it~ PS My friend wrote it and I don't even read it. . . know he never comes here ><

View more about Revolver reviews

Extended Reading
  • Thomas 2022-03-26 09:01:06

    Why did I feel that Statham was so useless, at first I thought it was awesome?

  • Colleen 2022-03-28 09:01:03

    A bad film is a bad film, no matter how you pretend to be a B, it is a bad film

Revolver quotes

  • Macha: Jesus Paul! Why don't you just fucking rape me?

  • Macha: [to French Paul] Look at me! Does it look like i care about the consequences? Fuck him!

    Lord John: [in subtitles, to Fat Dan] Fuck him!

    Macha: Fuck the consequences!

    Lord John: Fuck the consequences!

    Macha: Fuck them all!

    Lord John: Fuck them all!