One thing down one thing

Geovanny 2022-03-24 09:02:56

While watching this movie, this sentence kept going back and forth in my mind.
The male protagonist's name is Leonard, and he instantly thought of the bad boy from the Big Bang Theory. He felt that the outlines were really similar, and he thought to himself: The original name of Leonard is like this. This is gossip.
This is a split story of you splitting me and I splitting you. If the two lovers are Michelle and Sandra for Leonard, they are Leonard and Ronald for Michelle. There is an intersection of such a combination, that is, Michelle and Leonard. But probably because it exists as an intersection of cheating behaviors in this story about cheating, it is doomed that they cannot achieve positive results.
Both L and M have serious personality weaknesses. L experienced a fruitless love, resulting in psychological fragility and distortion and often self-harm, M relied on drugs to regulate emotions, fell in love with a married man and lived in the back of the mainstream. As a spare tire, L has a relatively high attitude, at least there is a crazy S for him. In fact, the film does not exaggerate the personality, conditions and other aspects of each character, but uses the emotion of "splitting" as a consistent clue.
According to the life I can understand and want to see, Leonard is a character who has suffered a failure in love and is frivolous on the outside and sad on the inside. He has various conflicts and struggles, but he is also a representative type of ordinary men in modern metropolitan life. Michelle is the kind of woman who is charming and romantic, has a beautiful face and a good figure, and is admired by countless men but has not belonged to it. She is also engaged in public relations and other industries. Sandra is the kind of woman who is expected to become a recognized good wife and mother in the future. For their emotions and their other half, they are born with tolerance and submissiveness, so they know how to measure each other and keep flowing.
On the one hand, a man like Leonard can have a simple and warm family, provided he chooses a woman like Sandra. On the other hand, what they long for in their hearts is a passionate, impulsive and romantic life experience, which makes them at the beginning of life after being flat for too long. Seeing a woman like Michelle will easily fall.
A woman like Michelle will never lack a willing spare tire, but the one she worships as the Lord and God often lacks the realistic conditions to combine with her. Due to the lack of security, they are prone to fall in love with men with families, because such men have a subtle habit of caring for others than single men, and they also have an illusion that people can rely on.
A woman like Sandra is probably powerless to deal with emergencies. If L and M eloped successfully at the end, Sandra probably couldn't do anything. But once this accident does not happen, their stamina and persistence are unmatched by M.

Talking a lot of nonsense, in fact, no matter who is with whom, who betrays who, in terms of process, Sandra loves Leonard, Leonard loves Michelle, and Michelle loves Ronald.
Love is nothing but one thing.

View more about Two Lovers reviews

Extended Reading
  • Madonna 2022-03-28 09:01:07

    Whether the person you are holding hands with is the person you love, and whether the person you are infatuated with is also true love. After watching this movie, I feel more and more like how my life is fucked up

  • Leann 2022-03-29 09:01:06

    No one is right or wrong in love. It is up to you to choose an ideal type or a realistic type. In a polyamorous love, it is inevitable to get hurt. Only when you give up will you want to choose the other in peace.

Two Lovers quotes

  • Michael Cohen: A kid's got to start thinking about his future sometime.