God is dead?

Eryn 2022-04-23 07:02:36

The two narrative lines go hand in hand. The ophthalmologist's out-of-control extramarital affair and wa's filming of a documentary about successful people that he despises. In the end, the two protagonists meet, the doctor summarizes his insights and wa's usual realistic and optimistic philosophy ends. (In reality, we live rationally and deny the facts, otherwise it will be difficult to live.) It is better to leave out the final forced answers, and stop throwing out the questions that human beings have been looking for all their lives and finally explore the unknown stage of the process. (We are the sum of the choices we make. When God created things, it seems that the happiness of human beings was not considered.) Through the context of the murder after derailment, the doctor's perspective leads to the question of the moral system, the torture of religion, and the life. myth. (Whoever wants morality, there is morality in the world. Doing it without moral condemnation is free. Even if the belief is wrong, it is better than the doubter.) Life and movie clips have interesting transition cuts. Life in wa's films is always dramatic, chaotic, full of emergencies, absurdities, and tributes to "Wild Strawberry" (returning to the house paragraph). The fly in the ointment is that philosophical thinking is presented through dialogue, instilling a strong sense of education, and the blank space at the end is blocked.

Josefa 2021-12-31 08:02:12

five-star director seven-star writer