What interests me is not the plot of the film itself, but the use of literary techniques.
Teachers teach students to constantly create conflicts to increase the expressive power of the works. The establishment of such conflicts is not external but must be the protagonist himself. The constant anxiety and choice in his heart can contribute to this tension.
As everyone knows, this is actually a drama within a drama like a case within a case.
The teacher wrote a book when he was young, but it was unsuccessful. In the final analysis, he had no real-life experience, because what he imagined would never be fresh, and it could not capture the hearts of readers.
The boy's first article firmly grasped the teacher, and he had his most primitive desire for this subject, like the boy, voyeurism. This actually tells us that what can always hold us is something that arouses our curiosity or a desire to explore. Otherwise, why are you still sitting in front of the screen watching this movie?
The boy is a character in the boy's pen. He tells his own experience, and at the same time he deliberately adds some pre-set situations. Is it really emotional, or just to tell others that he is really emotional?
The boy is a character written by the teacher. Although we have not seen the teacher's writing, from the perspective of all the plots, the teacher is the biggest director behind all this. We have no way of knowing what he wrote when he was young, but by the time he saw the first, he had already decided that this was the story he had been after. As he said, I don't have your potential. This potential is not only the use of brushstrokes, but also this experience and this age. Moreover, he himself is caught in the constant establishment and resolution of self-conflict.
He went to steal math exam papers, he tutored boys in composition and was so indifferent to his wife.
Until in the end, he lost his job and his wife's burden and departure, all of which he walked into other people's lives and made his own life completely trapped. Even if he gets what he wants in the end, he can never get out of it.
Just like, when I was writing in high school, the teacher told us that only by moving our own works can we move others. The reason seems simple, but the sacrifices are often immeasurable.
He gave his real life, he made a huge impact on his reality, he clearly knew that he could stop the conflict at any time in the middle, but he still encouraged the boy to continue, and let the boy who was peeped write a complaint letter to complain he. He couldn't take it anymore, until at last he created something he was satisfied with, until he gave his life. Just imagine, how many unfinished things in our life are waiting for us to pursue, until what are you willing to give up?
I wrote this, you must think it's just a two-level relationship, but you may have forgotten that this is a movie, and this is also written by a screenwriter! What is the story behind this screenwriter, do you want to know?
Not finished, to be continued.
View more about In the House reviews
