View more about Apocalypse: The Second World War reviews
life
Keegan 2022-10-01 13:41:07
After watching this documentary, out of the war itself, I chose to avoid and remain silent. In the sixth episode of Counterattack, I didn't even want to watch it, and I didn't have the motivation to watch it. I don't know how to judge the countries that started the war, for the survival of their own nation, or for the satisfaction of their inner desires? I still remember that a commentator on war once said something similar: war itself has also led to the advancement of science and technology. Technology has advanced. This is the only passive benefit that I think is brought about by waging war, and it may not even count as one. Is the development of technology in peacetime really slower than that in wartime? Is the so-called wartime pressure effect really that significant? As for war, perhaps not just war, but the force represented by war, the martial human, I think this is what Hitler called a low-level race. Only the lowest of the last man can show such blatant animal nature in his bones, and every war command shows contempt for life. Look at the Soviet Union, which dances with wolves out of greed, and the Vitch government, which supports fascism out of fanaticism and frustration. The ethics and morality of human beings have been ravaged in this war. Perhaps we should not use this war but most of the human wars. It is like a gang fight between gangsters. The difference is only in the degree. Put the bullets on and become a gang fight all over the world. Of course, the significance of this documentary is not only a reflection on the war itself, but any human science, whether it is social science or natural science, will trigger new thinking because of this war. Finally, I want to say: No matter what we do, the last thing we can do against is nature and life. Respect nature and cherish life!
Extended Reading
