woman who put herself in danger

Zack 2022-06-28 10:53:27

The first episode does have a large amount of information, but I personally think it is not clueless. On the contrary, the rhythm of the episode and the portrayal of characters complement each other, so I will sort it out here for discussion.

Involving a lot of spoilers, please don't open the children's shoes if you haven't seen it...

In the first scene, Stein eats with his brother and his father in a restaurant and witnesses his father being brutally killed.
The opening narration is about "trust". For people with multiple identities, a belief must exist and be chosen. Of course it didn't immediately tell what Stein believed.
In the restaurant scene, it can be seen that Stein, as a girl, obeys the rules and etiquette, and witnesses his father being killed suddenly in a place he is familiar with and has a sense of security. (It's not that it didn't have a lifelong impact on her. From the back, she didn't sleep in her large and comfortable bed, but entered a narrow and pure white space similar to a prison cage to curl up and lie down. You can see the lack of security.)
The character of her brother is also improved . Reflect, unruly in the restaurant, active. So much so that at first I thought Stein was an older sister rather than a younger sister.

In the second main scene, also in this restaurant, Stein announces the start of the third phase of the project with the Palestinians.
These dozens of minutes of play are rich in content.
The collaborators were killed before the preaching could start.
The older brother's family of five and a female nanny is a common British family. When his son Kasim was gone, his brother and his wife didn't even notice. In this restaurant where his father was killed, the nanny found out and went to look for it. The sister-in-law's comment on the nanny shows that she is a vulgar hostess who only cares about appearances.
At the same time that Stein announced the start of the third phase of the project, the nanny was nervously looking for Kasim, and the usual press conference was surging, and it was two women who devoted their efforts to face the unknown.
At the end of the press conference, his father's old comrade-in-arms lost the qualification to cooperate. Facing his questioning, Stein just asked his assistant to throw out the investigation results, and the other was to keep saying "I'm sorry." A typical British expression, Stein has accepted Orthodox British education.

By now, I already know that my brother is still as careless as he was when he was a child, and he has married an equally careless and shallow wife, but the female nanny at home is a cautious person. Stein won the title, inherited his father's business, and continued to run the company left by his father in an idealized way (hoping that common prosperity will bring peace to both Palestine and Israel, is it an idealization for women to deal with political issues?), doing what she thinks is right He did not hesitate to be the enemy of his father's former friend.

The suspense left by the screenwriter is, where did she get education related to the Israeli-Palestinian issue when her parents died in her early years? Why didn't my brother inherit his father's legacy? Why didn't she start a normal and ordinary British family? What is her motive?

These questions are initially explained in the next few clips. The woman from the British Foreign Office, the head of the spy agency, Stein and the nanny meet in the dining room. Stein broke down in tears when his engineering partner was assassinated before the press conference, and the two had been kidnapped by thugs a few years ago. Two equally strong women have a deep intersection beneath the surface.

In the final scene, the older brother takes his children to a concert alone, and Kasim is kidnapped in the theater. Stein chased after him in the dark, his bodyguard died, and Kasim was kidnapped. Isn't this ending unexpected?

A woman, Woman, can take care of children, can cry, can be soft-hearted, sensitive creatures, why do they take a dangerous road of no return? What is she trying to protect, protect and fight for?

I thought the screenwriter of this play was a woman, but it turned out that Hugo Blick was a man.

View more about The Honorable Woman reviews