But after watching the movie, when I look back and think about it, I find that the handling of many parts of the movie is a bit bizarre.
Impression one, the film begins with the unilateral dismissal of a BBC reporter. The decadence and anger displayed by this man made me wonder what caused him to be forced to resign. Then soon the story progressed to the point where he was noticed at a wine party and asked to write a news about a topic. The transformation was so fast that he agreed to follow up with a little anger. He quickly brushed aside his previous intense depression.
Impression 2: The scene of the heroine about the monastery getting along with the children in her youth and watching the children being taken away is particularly distressing. Played quite well. But the old man recalled the feeling of looking for his own child and the expression of the innermost things could not see the character of the heroine. It feels quite flimsy. On the contrary, her own daughter did a good job, and the attention to her mother's emotional state was very moving.
Impression 3: After finding my son, I found that the death of my son and the deception of the old nun were not so painful. It is supposed to be the climax of the dramatic conflict. The description and performance here are a little strange, but they are tolerant. Well, she is a devout believer? So forgive the nun, but the nun's kind of self-defense these words. And shouldn't the performance be portrayed? It's that easy to forgive. And then look at the child cemetery, with some unexpected ending to a poem and a book as an explanation for her own reaction?
Incredible. So the scenes that were originally warm, the themes that were warm, and the performance of the characters' characters were too thin, which made me feel a little rough.
View more about Philomena reviews
