After watching it, I communicated with my friends and found that this is really a good film with a high-quality screenwriter.
A lot of trivial things at the beginning have actually been laying the groundwork for the appearance of the "little boy" later. I have limited memory and I can remember a few episodes for the time being. For example: 1) The mother told the female lead to read aloud or play music, and the doll was clearly beside the female lead. The purpose was actually to make the male lead who was hiding behind the wall heard. 2) The father told the heroine that the leftovers should be put in the refrigerator to feed the hero who was hiding at home. 3) The father taught the hostess to clean the mousetrap clips and said that the little boy was very afraid of small animals, and it was because the little boy lived in a clapboard basement or something that he encountered many small animals such as mice. Small plots like this abound.
Therefore, the appearance of the "little boy" in the back is actually expected and reasonable. After reading it, I felt that the little boy killed the little girl brutally due to psychopaths or other unknown reasons when he was 8 years old. The parents wisely thought of using a fire to "protect" the little boy, using his fake death to escape the police's questioning and the suspicion of the world; but as for the little boy's burns, I think it may be the little boy's self-blame Something made him not fully follow his parents' instructions, so he was really hurt. Then there are the partitions and the basement where the little boy lives. From the escape of the male and female protagonists, it can be seen that the little boy has a very large space for activities, and it is estimated that his parents helped him build it together. After that, in order to conceal and continue to protect the little boy, the parents had to pretend to replace the little boy with a doll to avoid the suspicion of the world and so on, perfectly shaping their loss of a child. But in fact, the parents of the little boy are also under a lot of psychological pressure. They know the perverted psychology of the little boy and the fact of murder, and they have been helping the "little boy", so in the end, when the heroine took over to take care of the doll, the parents' words were astonishing. Farewells are meaningful but secretive, and then the suicide of the parents is logical and logical.
Later, when the male and female protagonists escaped, from the action of the little boy hammering the male protagonist's head with something, it can be seen that the little boy should have brutally killed the little girl and used the same action; while the female protagonist escaped to the little boy's residence When I was in the basement, I saw the last words left by my parents on the table. The man who delivered it before brought a letter to the woman. It is estimated that the woman was stolen by the little boy before she could read it, otherwise the story will have to be told again. It ended half an hour early. . . . . The Lei Feng spirit of the male protagonist, the heroic heroine of the female protagonist, and the vigorous teasing of the little boy are sometimes harmonious and sometimes quite abrupt. But halfway through the film, the little boy's breakfast is really cute and it makes my fearful heart temporarily relaxed. It was a very unexpected transition point
. The broken doll at the end was glued again. I don't know if it was for the sake of the topic; . . . . Seek expert advice. . . . .
After being used to watching bad movies, this kind of suspense movie that can stand up to scrutiny is really worth watching and watching again. . . Strong push!
View more about The Boy reviews
