The experimental design is obviously unreasonable, the entry and exit conditions are not clear, and the obligations and responsibilities of the hypothetical performances required in the experiment are not clear.
The police should not have the right to arrest people directly into the experiment.
This kind of experiment should be informed to family members, colleges, schools, classmates, colleagues, etc.
Experiments should be independent of reality.
There should be specific records such as corresponding third parties (such as lawyers) or documents.
It should be possible to quit the experiment at any time.
Ordinary people do not have the right to restrain their freedom under experimental conditions.
The original sentence of the answer should be like this, "In the case of the experiment, I will performatively say: yes, sir, Mr Correctional Officer, sir. In reality, I will say: Shabi, climb farther for Lao Tzu". Experiments are experiments, and reality is reality, don't bring it in casually, and in the experiment, it is necessary to add an explanatory sentence such as "if I will speak xxx in the experiment" before each sentence.
Think about how an actor does it.
Don't be superstitious about the so-called Stanford University. Stanford is just like that. Various experiments with unclear detailed descriptions like this, and they are still psychological experiments, can only be approved at that time. The conclusions drawn under such experimental premise are obviously not convincing, and are suspected of confusing people.
View more about The Stanford Prison Experiment reviews
