Isn't this long history of human beings a process of the same party fighting against differences?

Demetrius 2022-03-25 09:01:22

It is worthy of being named the 100 Best Epic Movies of the Century by the American Film Institute.

The theme of its performance has greatly surpassed the social, political, economic and humanistic environment at that time, and it is also far higher than the techniques of film art itself. From the betrayal of Jesus by the disciples, the wrongful death of black people, the cleansing of the Catholic Church and the demise of the ancient Babylonian kingdom, the theme of its expression is that human beings have always been "partisanship and sectarianism". Looking at the world now does not mean something. Ancient book burning and Confucianism, the Treaty of Versailles in World War I, the westward movement of the United States, the persecution of Jews, the East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere and the establishment of the United Nations, the division of Germany, the civil war between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party, the Korean War, the upheaval in Eastern Europe, the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the ideology caused The Cold War and the current domestic anti-corruption, the Iran-Iraq war abroad, the Kosovo war, the national radicals, the American-style democracy and the war in Afghanistan, the war in Syria, the war in Syria, al-Qaeda, ISIS, etc. brought about by American-style democracy and Western ecumenicalism, which is not the long river of human history "Parties fight against differences and form parties for profit". Did the so-called prejudice and hatred bring about the development of human history?

Written by myself, if you want to spray it, spray it.

The director never imagined that 100 years later, there will be people who will watch it as a classic. The rough texture and negative-like light, coupled with the film without live sound, is a disaster for many people who like special effects.

View more about Intolerance reviews

Extended Reading
  • Angelina 2022-04-24 07:01:25

    Godard said: The movie starts with Griffith and ends with Kiarostami. In fact, Griffiths invented every trick of storytelling. He helped build the myth of cinema. Compared with the racist tendencies that caused major criticism in "The Birth of a Nation", Griffith made timely remediation and corrections in "Party Dissent". And it almost became the first non-linear narrative film in film history. At that time, such a complex structure and super-long film set were difficult for the movie audience and market at that time to digest. With four stories spanning more than 2000 years, Griffith unabashedly conveyed his artistic ambitions and political ideals to the audience, a view that most historians agree with today: it was Griffith His artistic ambition, rather than pure originality, put him ahead of the filmmakers of his time. But whether it is the creation of the times or the drive of personal ambition. The status of "Party to Fight Differing" in the history of film is unshakable. Griffith was the first director to use all of his cinematic techniques in a systematic and harmonious way.

  • Norwood 2022-04-23 07:05:17

    Not to mention the director's political stance, there are still many ideas in the film that must have seemed novel at the time.

Intolerance quotes

  • Auctioneer at the Marriage Market: Any man will be happy with this sweet wild rose - this gentle dove.

  • Intertitle: The temper and rough language of the "wild rose" prove her to be not without thorns.