In the historical context, perhaps the law can be divorced from reality and only face the facts. Although this may seem unrealistic, in this history, it is not the injustice that Asian-African-Hispanic Americans have been subjected to in the United States. The treatment, nor the overly emotional speech in the courtroom, the real reason for innocence is that sentence" You might think he did it. Hell, I might think he did it. But can we honestly sit here and say they proved it ?" Law is law, it is so indifferent that makes people feel suffocated. Just like John Adams who stood up to the pressure of the independents in the American colonies and resolutely defended the British soldiers. It's more like the scene in "Twelve Citizens", where the law is the law, stripping away human feelings, only facing the facts, and only acknowledging the facts that are well-founded.
On the other hand, there are quite a few highlights in the last episode, not to mention the previous sentence that decided the outcome of the trial, "You gonna look for the real killer now?" Maybe the real killer has escaped safely, all because the prosecution insisted Simpson was identified as the suspect; perhaps he was, but the evidence had long since vanished through the prosecution's negligence. So who is the real murderer? Who is the real murderer not defined by emotion or cultural background? There is also the record of Clinton, which is a victory, but not the last paradise.
In the end Simpson sat alone in the room and cried, for the joy that he could escape the punishment he had? Or grieving over the killing of your dead beloved ex-wife? Or can't bear to remember what you have endured in the trial? Behind the trial of history, persistent contradictions still exist, and only cheers linger in our ears. You are sunshine when she is gone…
View more about American Crime Story reviews
