Yes, events themselves are neither right nor wrong. What brought me to think was the question of leadership, how to understand "power" itself. Is it force, is it personnel, is it finance? It seems that there are different first first definitions in different situations. But there is no doubt that the captain and deputy captain are both qualified leaders, and they have seized the first definition at different times. Of course, personality is a comprehensive consideration. But a few shots are impressive, the captain's morale before boarding the ship, but this may be a tradition, in short, unforgettable; the captain still asked for exercises during the fire, and later he expressed that the ship was built for war, and The war will not wait for everything to settle down; it is still this conversation, the conversation between the captain and the deputy captain about leadership, what makes me think more is not the content of the conversation, but the form of such a conversation, this sense of proportion; The captain's counterattack is also very meaningful. You are new to a new environment. How to win support? First of all, the fight for a soldier is also very distinctive because he witnessed the soldier's fight and discussed with him about a certain comic work. , this kind of personal communication may be easy to reach a tacit understanding at a critical moment, including him encouraging a novice signal soldier, hitting the weapon officer at the first time, etc. Thinking from the literary form itself, an alternate history may be more intriguing. After all, in this case, everyone will subconsciously believe that it is not the consequence of nuclear war in the end, which will weaken the intensity of the conflict to a certain extent. In the end, I tend to believe that the old captain himself is happy, even though he has no family and only a puppy.
View more about Crimson Tide reviews
