A war genre film with a very solid script. The conflict mainly takes place in the decision-making office. There are very few real battle scenes and more discussions about human nature. This story is an anti-terrorist version of the tram paradox, whether to sacrifice one person or 80 people. At first, you may think that it is a confrontation about a virgin bitch or a war madman. Later, it became more and more obvious to see that in fact, you are here Those who have the power to make decisions do not care about this person or the 80 people themselves. What they really care about is whether the decision made today will be leaked. What is the impact. As for the civilians who are innocently involved, they are only 45% and 65%. What kind of psychological trauma will the soldiers on the front line carry out orders will not be considered by them. Soldiers only need to change positions within 12 hours That's it. This is actually very, very cruel. The pain caused by war is more invisible and indescribable. In the final analysis, this is a problem where a person's butt decides his head. The position of a person in war determines his thinking. With manners and mannerisms, whoever is in a war will only be hurt, and no one will be spared. At the end of the film, I paid tribute to Alan Rickman in the form of subtitles, and then I was shocked to realize the cruelty of time. This film is the posthumous work of "Professor Snape", and the news of his death has long been forgotten. Finally, let's commemorate him with this excellent posthumous work.
View more about Eye in the Sky reviews
