The story can even be interpreted like this: The
first paragraph: When the gay director is exhausted, his first love boyfriend finds him and brings a script "Journey", which describes their life in the church school and a simulation after they grow up. After being in love, the mandarin duck was beaten by the pedophile priest. The priest took advantage of his first love boyfriend's desire to leave a gay director, and took possession of his first love boyfriend. Men may be animals that use sex as a tool, whether it is a tool of venting or a tool of exchange. But the pedophile priest still deceived his first love boyfriend, and the gay director was eventually forced to leave the church school. In the script, the story after they grow up is fictitious, but it is the wishful thinking of their first love boyfriend-encounter in a transvestite bar, the sky thunders
intrigue ; the blackmail priest••• gay director is very interested in this story , But he did not agree with his first love boyfriend to play the lead role. By the pool, the gay director raped his first love boyfriend with his eyes, but the other party was willing to maintain his final restraint. The gay director has always been skeptical, and his first love boyfriend sticks to the bottom line. Both of them used their bodies to seduce each other, but no one took the initiative to attack.
The second paragraph: The gay director finally came to the hometown of her first love boyfriend. It was the younger brother of her first love boyfriend who held the script. The gay director learned that there used to be a script in front of his first love boyfriend, and it was indeed "Journey". After returning home, he met his boyfriend's brother. He agreed with him to play, and he auditioned wildly in bed with him. The film went on as scheduled, ending with the death of her first love boyfriend as a sublimation. After the last shot was finished, the boyfriend's brother cried loudly on the set. At this time, the pedophile priest appeared.
The third paragraph: Father Pedophile has long become a publisher. A few years ago, he was blackmailed by his first love boyfriend, and his tool was the "Journey". At that time, her first love boyfriend had become a heterosexual, with a pair of beautiful breasts, she was raising money every day to become a more beautiful woman. Drug use and greed made her terrible like a ghost. While the priest was trading with the opposite sex, he valued the younger brother of the opposite sex. They went to Chen Cang secretly. The priest used money to satisfy his brother's material desires, and they madly combined the flesh and money. The younger brother finally felt that his brother’s existence was a torture to him and his family. He and the priest conspired to kill his brother. "The Journey" became the work of his younger brother, who became his first love boyfriend who could act in the act. The younger brother and the priest became strangers.
It turned out that the younger brother is a MB.
In the end: the gay director continues his life, the pedophile priest repeats the life of a heterosexual-blackmailing MB, and finally being hit by a truck by MB; that MB has achieved his goal-he has become a big star.
By the way, the gay director is called Enrique, the first love boyfriend & heterosexual is called Iglecio, the pedophile & publisher and murderer is called Father Moreau, and the pretender is the MB who kills the last brother and kills the husband. At the beginning of the film, it was called Angela, who pretended to be Iglecio, who was actually his brother Juan.
I try to narrate this story without feeling emotionally. I try not to let you think that there is right and wrong in it. He is just the growth and life of four comrades. In this story, there is no good comrade.
Enrique is not; he is relatively outsider, but because of curiosity, he indulges Juan's deception, and constantly uses his own rights to occupy Juan.
Father Moreau is not; he forced Iglecio, he bought Juan, he cooperated with Juan to kill his brother, he blackmailed Juan.
Iglecio was not; he blackmailed, he took drugs, he even gave up his identity as a man.
Juan is not; he uses his body to satisfy his desires.
But it’s just bad education. Everyone’s education to others is bad, but it’s by no means destructive. When the four people lose, they all get it. When the four people committed the so-called crimes, they all used themselves to redeem.
Life is balanced. They have all been happy. The joy of Enrique and Iglecio’s first love, Moreau’s joy of possessing Iglesias, Enrique’s joy of conquering Juan, Juan’s joy of getting gifts, Iglesia’s joy of writing the script , Moro and Juan’s happiness together, Juan’s success, and Juan
Amedova calmly told the story of such a man.
I am so entangled in bad education rather than destructive education because of the translation of the film's title. There are generally two versions on the disc market, one is "Bad Education" and the other is "Destructive Education". From the literal and movie plot point of view, "bad" corresponds more to the original "Bad". "Destructive" may be caused by the translator's feelings after watching the movie.
The reason why Amedova is calm is that in such a story that uses possession, lies and murder, Amedova's narrative has always been objective. In the movie, he did not heroize someone or demonize someone. As I described earlier, everyone has good and beautiful things in their hearts, as well as evil and dirty things. In this movie, there are living, naked men.
When Enrique pushed the door and separated himself from Juan, the curtain fell. We are all spectators, watching their joys and sorrows. They are not by our side, but they are the lives of all of us.
View more about Bad Education reviews
