Do women need to be treated the same as men in every aspect? This question may be a good proposition for debate. I am the absolute opponent. "War of the Gender" is not a victory for women. The more reason is that the two sides are the top female athletes in the golden age and the 55-year-old retired potbellied old man. They demanded that the other side be the top male athletes in the golden age. Obviously ignoring the physiological differences, but at least the athletes who can represent the average level of men's tennis during the service period are not considered to be invincible, right? I do not oppose the values of this movie, but the opponent is too weak, this kind of victory is self-confidence!
The women's championship bonus is required to be the same as the men's. This is equivalent to that my country's football is too bad. We require a group of teams similar to ours to compete alone. The final championship requires the same bonus as the World Cup championship. Of course, Chinese football does not do this, but why is it that women's tennis is so vigorously promoted to do so? Women's tennis has less prize money only because of its weaker viewing. Other reasons such as women's tennis because they attract fewer spectators and sponsors are unreasonable.
Gender equality is that what I gain has nothing to do with my gender, and what I lose has nothing to do with it. Not all others!
View more about Battle of the Sexes reviews
