I think it can be a little better than the first one.
The focus of the first part is to attract new ideas. The focus is on revealing a pattern of ghost killings by finding connections between several cases.
The second part focuses on the psychological details.
The two parts are perfect together.
Some people say that the second part is a repetition of the first part, that is, their brains are too simple. From the perspective of suspense, the second part is weaker than the first part, but from the details, the second part is more refined than the first part.
If the facts of the first part are inserted into the second part, maybe a more exciting 2in1 can be produced.
Compared with Jingcheng No. 81, although they are two unconnected stories, they are actually a simple repetition of stories. The two sinister movies still have both inheritance and differences. It would be better to connect them together as one. The goodness of the two films seems to me a bit different.
However, although the subject matter is relatively new, the routine is still very old. It's the kind of routine in which a character who has no superpowers and loves to die overwhelmingly explores the truth about ghosts. In contrast, the passive introduction of domestic ghost films may be even less inviting.
View more about Sinister 2 reviews