The mediocre feeling when I was young, and the vulgar web texture when I look back

Breanna 2022-01-01 08:02:08

When I first watched it, I was in middle school. At that time, I just subconsciously compared this film with Saving Soldiers, and the texture was mediocre. Now when I look back again, I can’t use the metaphor of mediocrity with a 3.5-point vulgar work.

Abuse of upgrading, abuse of black field dissolve. The flooding and useless BGM, one after another, seems to not make the picture too quiet (under the influence of Cantonese opera in the early stage of Hong Kong film, it has been a movie for a long time). The photography is almost the same as the one-handed stabilizer used to shoot Douyin. There are too many bellows and the positional relationship jumps. . . . Most of the inner values ​​of the heart are spoken in the lines. Every slow motion shot in the film is a torture, as if the director jumped out: "Look, it's so cool." This is not in line with human audiovisual perception. Upgrade should only be used in rare cases.

Exposing director low B, the lack of a systematic knowledge system of film production process several magic weapons: upgrading, black field dissolving, music that does not conform to the plot, explosions, tearing without value padding .

Almost everywhere in this film, there is a sense of sight of the modern Russian theme of the World War II anti-fascist film, and it comes in slow motion at every turn.

In addition, as a military theme, the details of the props have certain highlights. Rarely seen 96 light machine gun with bayonet and grenadier. But the explosion that appeared was too exaggerated. A grenade of a grenadier can be about 40-80mm at most, which is the most explosive power of a mortar shell. And because there is no sight, the accuracy of the hit is unstable. In the film, a bomb tossing barrel exploded and the flames soared to the sky, almost the same as the explosion range of a 150mm heavy artillery. Said so much, because these are low-end performances only used in domestic TV dramas. Exploded for the "stage effect". "Saving Soldiers", "Brothers Company", "Iwo Jima Family Letters", can be used as a reference. War-themed movies, if you want to express a view of history, should all be based on realism.

There are too many loopholes in the drama, everywhere, so I don't want to analyze it. Bad heart

Bad photography, a lot of zoom, the texture of this strong 80s Hong Kong film, rough, rough, lack of basic film knowledge and cultural accomplishment

It’s so uncomfortable, I feel like I watched a Web University

View more about Windtalkers reviews

Extended Reading
  • Damian 2022-03-27 09:01:10

    The films directed by Chinese are indeed different from the performance of Americans in World War II. Those who are accustomed to American-style movies may find the way of director Woo's performance a bit strange, but it's still very good as a change of taste. But I still haven't figured out, is it more important to focus on the windtalker group or the people who protect them?

  • Crawford 2022-04-23 07:02:43

    Give it three stars, I didn't watch this movie for Nicolas Cage, but it turned out to make him a full protagonist.

Windtalkers quotes

  • Joe Enders: [to Gunnery Sergeant Hjelmstad] I can't do my job!

  • Joe Enders: You think too much.

    Private Chick: First time I've ever been accused of that.