In fact, I didn't want to write a long review, but recently friends have infinitely reposted a variety of abstract humanistic vocabulary articles, but the level of scientific and technological theory is almost zero, which is maddening. Everyone is reading all kinds of semiotics books. Can you pick up the SLR and study the shutter and aperture?
Take the picture as an example
These are the two most common comparison pictures of "Gemini Killer" recommending high frame rates. It is said that they represent the difference between 24 frames and 120 frames. And countless people made 120 frames of clearer speeches.
It is unfortunate to tell everyone that this is a way of propagating Fang Chicken Thief. In fact, both of these two GIFs only have 8 frames . Yes, you read that right, these two frame rates are the same, both are only 8 frames !
However, the two gif images have different levels of clarity visible to the naked eye, but if the resolution and frame rate are the same, why does it look much clearer below?
Let me show you a single-frame comparison of the fifth frame of the two pictures.
The reason is that the pictures of each frame in the two gifs are different. If you look at a single frame, I believe that students with a basis in photography can already point out that the reason why the picture below is clearer than the picture above is that the shutter speed is fast enough .
The shutter is the exposure time of each frame; the frame rate is the number of frames per second. The camera shutter cannot change the frame rate, and the frame rate can only affect the slowest shutter speed.
Whether it is 24 frames or 120 frames, you can shoot images with a fast shutter speed. At this time, there will be very little motion blur in a single frame. Even the above 8 frames have been done.
In fact, even if it is a traditional 24-frame movie, when shooting sports scenes, in order to let everyone see the action and reduce the smear, the shutter speed cannot be in accordance with the minimum standard. People just find a balance between motion blur and clear motion. Just point.
Therefore, if someone talks about 120 frames technically, a single frame is clearer than 24 frames, which does not hold true.
Does that 120 frames make no sense at all? no. The frame rate has no direct influence on the picture itself, but it has an influence on the continuity of picture playback. The higher the frame rate, the more perfect the movement process, and the smoother the viewing process, without a sense of jumping.
We can even simply say that the degree of clarity (motion blur) is determined by the shutter speed, and the degree of smoothness is determined by the frame rate.
At the same time, I found that many people unintentionally or deliberately confuse the various technologies used in "Gemini Killer", and put a lot of credit that originally belonged to 3D or 4K or less marginal to 120 frames.
The so-called pores can be seen clearly, and the statement that the pores are too clear is actually not related to 120 frames. This is only related to a single frame, mainly 4k high resolution and low motion blur with high shutter speed. Maybe Also add HDR and 3D technology. Shooting a stationary or slow-moving object does not have too high requirements on the frame rate and shutter speed.
I don’t understand what Ripple’s classmate is serious, Bazin and Deleuze’s talking about the high frames of this shot. The main look and feel of this lens is caused by the distortion of the wide-angle lens. It really makes me dumbfounded that the technology is metaphysics.
As for the various zooms mentioned in the article, these are all developments in traditional film techniques, and have nothing to do with the frame rate.
I personally think that Ang Lee’s 120-frame attempt failed, especially in many motion scenes where the blur is too low, resulting in a strong sense of CG, as if watching the cutscenes of the game. The game industry originally made clear cg, but now with the advancement of technology, dynamic blur is added to it. Ang Lee and game makers probably always have one side wrong.
Here I am a big boss Cameron, he thinks: "I have some own views on high frame rate technology, it can solve some specific problems of 3D under certain circumstances: for example, when you pan the camera jitters quickly. Time. For me, high frame rate is just a solution for this kind of situation. It cannot be called a format, and it will not be a big event like 70mm, but Ang Lee obviously doesn’t think so. 'In the sequel, I will use this technique sparingly, but the whole movie will not use a high frame rate."
To me, "Gemini Killer" is just a movie that experimented with new technology but was unsuccessful and had a sparse script, but the director had some wonderful audiovisual schedules. This script was probably considered trendy and popular in 1997, and it is now completely at a bad street level. On this basis, it analyzes what rebellion against patriarchy, Oedipus complex, etc., like watching a "Time Planning Bureau" vigorously analyzing the proletarian revolution. The argument is not to say that it is irrelevant, but that it is not necessary.
Let’s put something interesting at the end.
If Dr. Qi Ai calling Ang Lee the Griffith of the 21st century can be regarded as a compliment, then Guan Yadi still has a borderless level.
Friends, at least the Griffith level , what level is that? Who is Griffith, I will translate for you, he is the father of film art . I can't imagine that flattery can reach this point. Too disgusting and funny.
The first sound film "Jazz Singer" is groundbreaking enough in the history of technology, right? No one knows the director, is it comparable to Griffith? Did the first color film have a big impact? Without Baidu, who can know the name? Everyone asks yourself, can a mere 120 frames compare with the influence of sound or color on the film itself?
At least Griffith level! You really can.
View more about Gemini Man reviews
