So when I saw the maid was so young and beautiful (a typical Latin beauty) and the host and the host had friction (but no Friction is impossible, right?) After that, they became extremely sensitive to the ambiguous factors in the aura between them.
Just where their ambiguous concentration was about to break through the limit and cause an accident, there appeared two details that I liked- -It seems that this is the first time that the details that touched me have appeared since I watched a movie intensively. The
host met Philo when he was out after being told by his wife that she had an affair with someone else, and then went to the restaurant together, the host asked Fei Luo (I haven't remembered the name for one night, but there is a plot about the pronunciation of her name in this movie that made me remember the name) What to drink, and Philo said nothing, and persuaded the man Don't drink either, thinking that they shouldn't drink at this time and they should stay awake. The first detail appears here. After the man listened to it, he put down the glass that was poured, and the camera gave a close-up of the action of the glass being put down. It took at least ten seconds. This sudden close-up attracted me, and I was puzzled for a while, but when the cup was put down, Philo said that I thought you were going to say sorry again. The close-up touched, because when I look back, I feel that the whole field of vision was watching the process of slowly lowering the cup, and it was almost an audience member of me being substituted into Philo's body. This sense of substitution is unprecedented, although Xu Many films will have perspective substitutions, and there will be techniques that aim to let you be substituted to experience the feelings, but for me, this time is the most wonderful! Maybe the original intention of the director was not like this, but it came to me. At that time, it was like this.
Another is that after they pierced the layer of paper, when the two were on the sofa, Philo said they were leaving. The man said that he would wait a while, saying "the ground is hell", and then the camera features two people again. The bare feet hanging down from the sofa but not touching the ground swayed very slightly.In fact, I knew their non-ground state by thinking about the sentence before, so I am a little confused about this close-up, if it is only about that In terms of the description of the state, such close-ups have never made me feel, or they are in a movie that looks like this (a certain style, but I don’t like it), otherwise I will feel abrupt. But then it brings surprises. , They continued to stay on the sofa...then Philo kissed the man and finally said that I love you, which made the man never recover. (Me too, this "I love you" can be said to be finally possible Said it was an "accident"-she would say it unexpectedly), just as the man was gradually or preparing to enter the state, Philo hit the ground and ran away. Uh, the switching of the camera really felt like a sudden. However, it is clear for people to see. The close-up of the foot on the ground has a very small speed and can clearly feel a kind of force. The translation of that force is decisive. Now connect the front and back, especially the sentence "The ground is hell"...Uh, I was completely defeated by this plot. He clearly conveyed to me some of the things that would be the best and bad words. I can only sigh.
According to the man The ground is hell, then, he is indeed in heaven, because there is Philo’s kiss and "I love you", then Philo stepped into hell, and ran away without looking back. Say, did you step into hell? Does Philo think hell? At least I don’t think so. I don’t know if this paragraph is meant to express the feelings of heaven or hell, and I can’t tell who is in heaven and who is in hell. Only one thing is certain. Some aspects of their state can be described as the separation between heaven and human, and it also contains Philo's choice and results. And what supports her in making such a choice is: "There are some mistakes, You can’t commit a crime when you have children.”
In addition, when the man and Philo went to the restaurant together, the relationship between them was really on the verge of breaking out. I was really nervous, and I really don’t want their previous control and patience to be abandoned. I even have a tendency to be angry and emotional, I want to say If the person has an affair, does not mean you can indulge their lust for granted, and the other mistakes you do not act the same reason, do not make this mistake could get a non-defended the legitimacy of your actions.
the results two Sure enough, it didn't disappoint me (when watching this is as nervous as watching some action movies, alas...), on the other hand, when the man went back, he was about to collapse, and the wife who was crying with a red nose was very nervous and wanted to know , I want to ask my husband if he touched her (Filo). I think everyone knows at this time. If you ask like this, it will add fuel to the already tense relationship between them, but everyone will think Ask him if he touched her-if it was the person involved. Fortunately, her mother stopped her (this mother has always been a sane role-she was also telling her daughter to end the affair-I really put her and that one The intermediary’s ambiguity has been forgotten) and told her that I can only say: I’m glad you can come back. Fortunately, this daughter is still obedient, and still resisted. It suddenly made me want to warn myself if I was like this , You can’t just suspect that the other party will do the same, you have not controlled it, don’t think that others are too. The
last thing to say is that the whole story is actually enclosed in a letter, but you can also use Chinese concepts to say a composition. (In fact, it can be regarded as a novel. I remembered the FANS letter written by Songzi in Songzi's life ==), which is an application letter written by Philo's daughter to Princeton. The last sentence: What I want to say is , If you admit me, I won't change it for you. It's really awesome. It happened to be yesterday that I saw an article about Harvard girl Liu, and I saw those eight-legged application articles, and then I looked at this and I sighed that I was not admitted. Who is this little protagonist admitted? The end of the film is not disappointing. It ends with the mother and daughter who have resolved the contradiction hugging on the bus instead of flying over the admission letter of a prestigious school... (Speaking of this, I I remembered a red peach K ad I saw before. Khan)
When contacting the previous quarrel about her mother not letting her go to a private school, the last question my mother asked: Do you want to be different from me...Uh, Philo, who didn’t understand before, is about recommending her daughter to go private. The fierce performance of the school, etc., finally became clear (At the time, I wondered if she said that if the two points after going to the school were possible, she should not want to see it). Of course, the film has a talk at the beginning This is a bit about race and cultural differences. The whole film is also about differences and adaptations. The tone of change and persistence is just made by my previous long talk. It seems that love is very prominent. Hehe, it should be said that the whole film contains multiple levels. Things, very rich emotions and content.
Uh... well, well, the more I talk, the more I like it, and the endless, the more I talk, the more I find my love for this film, I will be willing to spend money to buy a disc There aren’t many films in this list, but this one is for DVD collection.
Quoting a comment titled ""Spanish Maid" is not a comedy, but full of emotions."
If you want to watch a film that can laugh out loud, it may be
I'm going to be disappointed... if you want to use comedy to adjust your mood, don't be fooled by this publicity, maybe you will be more depressed after watching it (if you support the male and female protagonists)
View more about Spanglish reviews
