I haven’t read the novel. The first half of the film still feels good, and it is quite tense. In the second half, the IQ has turned sharply. Later, I read the comments of the squirming doudouyou a little bit to understand the original work. The parentheses quote the comments of the squirming beanie with a hat. Lest I forget later. (The beginning of the movie did not clearly explain the original cause of the whole story. In the novel, Leo and his brother lived in an era of famine, and there would even be cannibalism. When Leo and his brother caught a cat in the forest Leo was taken away by a couple who was about to eat people. His younger brother didn’t notice that his brother was attacked because of myopia. Leo also lost his memory because of a concussion. Ao also left his brother and mother. Because of his young age and serious vision problems, Leo’s brother was unable to contribute to the family compared to Leo in the cruel environment at the time. His mother Because of this, he went crazy. When his mother was unconscious, he regarded his younger brother as an elder who loved him in every possible way, and when he was conscious, he would be cruel and harsh to the younger brother. Without this premise, it would be difficult for people watching movies to understand the murderer. The killing technique was the method that Leo taught his brother to kill cats at the beginning, and there is no way to feel why the murderer wants to feed the children's internal organs to the cats. These are the more important plots that have been deleted. I personally feel that the whole story is the most convincing. The ending was nervous and thoughtful. The scene where Leo and the murderer actually met and killed the murderer was also deleted.) The murderer’s motives were not explained, which is very bad.
View more about Child 44 reviews
