In fact, at the beginning of the film, it is stated that the film is based on real people's events but the content is hypocritical. It describes how a little person with no education and background struggles so hard that he and his family obtain the corresponding material and social status. ...... But, if this is all the film is about, it's probably hard to get such high ratings and heated discussions. It turned out that the protagonist abandoned the values he had always upheld when a certain historical event broke out after seeing the truth. A money worshipper turned into a democratic fighter, a person who should have lived a very smooth life. Kicked away what should have been a smooth and smooth life.
We use Wikipedia to search for relevant people and the ins and outs of some historical events. According to the development of the plot, we probably know that the person corresponding to the protagonist Song Youshuo in Korean history should be the former President of South Korea, Roh Moo-hyun. Then according to Roh Moo-hyun, we can bring out such a person: Chun Doo-hwan, the 11th and 12th President of South Korea and a retired general of the South Korean Army. Then we found out about the Gwangju incident in Korean history. (Because the space is too long, the results of the wiki are not indicated here). Then we come to a conclusion based on the development of the film and the evolution of the social form: the process of any democratic and law-based society is not smooth sailing, and it will inevitably take the courageous struggle of many people to actively strive for it. The popularization of the concept of the rule of law, although difficult in a certain period, is a must. It's not that we think so-and-so is bad so we're going to bring so-and-so down, or that we yearn for a social form we haven't even experienced to deny the existence of another, but before all problems, "law "Previous line.
How repeating and similar is history? Lenovo During this period of time, several public figures in our country have been detained one by one for certain things that cannot be said, and public opinion has been condemned while being tightened. What will happen? How should it be? John Mill said in his famous book "On Liberty": "If people want to interfere with the freedom of action of any individual in the group, whether the interference is individual or collective, the only legitimate purpose is to protect the self from harm. In the past, the powers exercised rightly against any member of civil society against his will have the sole purpose of preventing him from harming others. His own interests, whether physical or mental, cannot be used against him Sufficient reasons for imposing coercion....Anyone's actions are only socially accountable to the part that concerns others. In that part that concerns himself alone, his independence is logically absolute. For himself, I think the statement that the individual is the sovereign of his body and mind is equally applicable in the discussion of the relationship of government to individual liberty. While the practice of this practice felt despicable, it probably ruined his original original idea.
At the end of the movie, the protagonist Song Youshuo was in the dock because he was unfairly suppressed by the government. Ninety-nine lawyers defended him. I think at that moment, Song Youshuo probably felt that he was relatively happy.
View more about The Attorney reviews
