You know, the most terrifying thing is that there are no enemies, there is no mistake, hunters can only hunt to support their families in troubled times, young people must face the world, adults have to prove themselves, and even the colonial Japanese soldiers seem to be unable to help themselves, it seems that all this It is the wheel of fate that cannot stop. But the tiger doesn't care about that, it bluntly tears open these mild hypocrisy, and in the form of pure energy, the most primitive wildness gives a loud slap in the face to those who try to control its fate for whatever reason, sympathize with you, but you all die Bar. It also poignantly satirizes that period of history. The tigers resisted, taking one mountain and one leader as the pool, but the people have been yielding and shrinking.
This is a movie that disrupts values. If a person kills the tiger's mother, but saves and raises the little tiger, is the hunter a benefactor or an enemy? If a tiger accidentally kills a hunter's child in self-defense, but desperately snatchs back the body from the wolves, is the tiger a benefactor or an enemy? If a person is assimilated and tamed by a foreign race, but in order to better protect the tribe, will this person betray or save? At this point, we finally understand that the world is such a huge and complex system, and it is only a small part that can distinguish right from wrong. In most cases, we are faced with various "necessities" caused by the mutual domestication and mutual influence of various elements in the system. Simply, when we seem to be coerced by fate and have nowhere to go, we still have the spirit of this "big tiger": brilliant or lonely, I have existed.
In addition, this translator is from the Northeast, right? He always dances with a single word when tears are in his eyes, or does he need to rely on subtitles to assist in the role of the third position?
View more about The Tiger reviews
