Seeing Severus Snape dead brought tears to my eyes. In fact, Snape died 17 years ago. Alive, perhaps for this sacrifice 17 years later. Before dying, Snape left his memory to Harry Potter. Harry took this "memory" and put it in the Pensieve to see, and understood everything. It turned out that Snape was an undercover agent sent by Dumbledore to Voldemort. He had been secretly protecting him and directed the Jedi Counterattack with Dumbledore. good show. In flashbacks, I saw Snape use his Patronus magic in the presence of Dumbledore - the doe that had secretly guided Harry to the Sword of Gryffindor, the one that guarded with Lily When I saw the same doe - seeing Dumbledore's surprised expression, I burst into tears again. Think of "Les Miserables", think of Jean Val Jean. Jean Val Jean raised her orphan, incognito for more than 20 years, out of a promise to her dead love. But Snape may be more difficult than Jean Valjean, Cosette is Jean Valjean's heart, and Harry Potter, the son of James Potter, Snape does not like him. He expressed his distaste for the boy several times to Dumbledore, saying he was as arrogant as a father, which I believe Snape was telling the truth. But he secretly protected him for 17 years. I also thought of the dialogue between Gongsun Chujiu and Cheng Ying in "The Orphan of the Zhao Family" and the sentence "To live is more difficult than to die". So, Cheng Ying endured humiliation in the enemy's mansion for 20 years, and finally got his revenge. And Snape served as an undercover agent for Dumbledore under the most powerful and insidious demon Lord Voldemort. Voldemort was thousands of times more dangerous than Tu Anjia. In fact, the story of Severus Snape started circulating before the book (let alone the movie) came out. In my mind, Snape's story was already structured. So that when I read the book and the movie, my first feeling was, how could this be? I am very dissatisfied with many plots in the movie and book. The death of Severus Dumbledore planned his own death. Knowing he was dying, he directed a scene where Snape killed himself in front of Voldemort. Snape is done. This trick was so thoroughly deceiving that the Harry Potter camp hated him to the core, and Voldemort believed in his "loyalty". Old Deng died very tragically, and he knew very well, but Snape died a little bit inexplicably. Snape is dead. He was recruited by Voldemort and then bitten to death by the serpent Nagini. Whether reading a book or watching a movie, Snape seemed to have no idea that he was going to die this time, and he was still explaining to Voldemort repeatedly to avoid Voldemort's murderous topic. In fact, Snape buried the last secret with his death - who is the real owner of the Elder Wand. Voldemort thought it was Snape (because Snape killed Dumbledore, the original owner of the wand), as long as he killed Snape, he would become the owner of the Elder Wand, who knew that the owner of the Elder Wand was already someone else . So Snape's death concealed a false pretence of being deadly to Voldemort. Dumbledore planned his own death, and so should Snape. After Lily died 17 years ago, Snape's heart died long ago. In my opinion, Snape was prepared to die, and even how to die was prepared in advance when he played the big game of chess with Dumbledore. In contrast, with the handling in the book and in the movie, Snape's summoning that he would die from Voldemort was not only unexpected, but even a little embarrassing. Why Should I Die? I think it's Aunt Rowling's big failure. Snape not only gave memories, but also large sections of memories, which could almost make a prequel book. Maybe Rowling wanted to give Snape some compensation, but it seemed too sloppy. I don't even think Snape would leave the memory to Harry. Seventeen years ago, Voldemort came to kill the newly born Harry for the prophecy of the savior. At that time, as Voldemort's subordinate, Snape came to Dumbledore, hoping that Dumbledore could protect Lily. But Lily was killed in the end because she trusted the wrong secrecy. Snape was heartbroken and came to Dumbledore. Dumbledore had to ask Snape to protect Lily and James' orphan, Harry Potter, and said that Harry had Lily's eyes. Snape finally agreed, but on one condition, he wanted Dumbledore to keep it a secret. Secrecy, of course, not about his undercover business, but about his past with Lily (or with James), which I hope no one will ever mention again, Dumbledore agreed. Since it was supposed to be kept secret in the first place, why did you finally say it yourself? Not only did I say it, but I started from the beginning, 1510, starting with myself and Lily having no guesses, until at Dumbledore's own request, he killed Dumbledore, who had run out of time. Say so much? To prove his innocence? Or to win the sympathy of the public? Innocence cannot be self-proven, and sympathy is even cheaper. Snape was a betrayal all his life and had an anti-social complex (so he joined the Death Eaters), and after losing his lover, he was a lonely ghost. No matter life or death, he couldn't be with Lily anymore, he still cared about what he did Let everyone know about it? I believe he would rather have these memories obscured, leaving behind his own infamy as the last resistance and mockery of his own destiny. Of course, Snape could not care about his innocence, but the author did. She can actually write in many ways. One is simply "not certified". Snape was undercover, and no one in the wizarding world knew in the end, only the reader knew. Although this ending is more tragic, it does not fit the tone of the final reunion. If this is the final outcome, then the book will definitely not be called "Harry Potter" but "Severus Snape". There is also a "his certificate". For example, at the end of Les Misérables, Jean Valjean said nothing about his innocence, and prepared himself to be forgotten and obliterated. Cosette and Marius were married, and he deliberately broke his hand and refused to sign. Then moved, deliberately estranged from the young couple. Marius also because he heard some slander , and avoid getting close to Jean Valjean. Until the end, it was the rogue Denardier who wanted to inform, but instead of letting Marius recall some past events, he learned the truth. It was Jean Valjean who rescued him in the sewers. Only then did he take Cosette to visit Jean Valjean. At this time, Jean Valjean, who was in his twilight years, finally saw the last glimpse. This is not only the redemption of Jean Valjean, but the redemption of Marius. The full text is over, and the realm is all out. "He proves" is a clever way of writing. I think the truth about Snape, if Harry wants to know, must not come from Snape's memories. It is estimated that Dumbledore will not tell Harry (such as in the dream of coming back to life), after all, it is against Dumbledore's original promise to Snape not to tell the whole truth to anyone. I think, maybe Harry was in the confrontation with Voldemort, and some words by Voldemort inadvertently reminded Harry, and finally found the truth. Maybe a smarter way to write it. But Rowling chose the worst way to write it - "self-evidence". When Snape was dying, he left Harry with a flash of memory (the memory in the movie was actually a tear), gushing about his love history with his mother and his undercover history. Snape and Lily's past, these Harry Potter don't need to know. Even readers like me don't need to know so much detail. I don't thank Aunt Rowling at all, and I have no room for imagination. Why don't you write a prequel when you have time? Snape should die like a man, and the future generations will comment on his merits and guilt. It is his character that it is best to be buried in history and no one will remember it. I thought that the climax of the Armageddon should come after Snape's death. But no, after the long memories, there was Harry's long dream of returning to life. The book is long-winded, the movie is long-winded, and after the climax, Snape has long been forgotten. In short, the description of this memory, in terms of character building, really goes against Snape's rebellious and noble temperament and character. In terms of the structure and aura of the whole book, it also appears to be insufficiently atmospheric. I can only say that maybe because it is a book written by a woman. About Forgotten Magic Severus is a magical genius. There are quite a few geniuses throughout Harry Potter (Harry Potter is definitely not), Dumbledore and Grindelwald are geniuses, Tom Riddle (Voldemort) is genius, Lily and Snape are geniuses And later Hermione are geniuses (the latter four are not pure-blooded magicians, showing the advantages of mixed blood). Snape was obsessed with black magic in his early years. He always wanted to be a teacher of Defence Against the Dark Arts at Hogwarts. He must have a lot of experience with black magic. He's also a potions master. He has been taking courses in Potions. After Harry obtained the "Half-Blood Prince"'s potions notes when he was studying, Harry's potions improved by leaps and bounds even Hermione couldn't keep up. But his best thing is Occlumency. This is the key to his ability to deceive Voldemort, become an undercover agent, and finally make a major comeback. Why is Voldemort more dangerous than Tuanjia? Because he is the master of Demention. When he makes a comeback, his former henchmen, the former Death Eaters, will be subject to his scrutiny. He is also entering the memory of others, torturing others, and obtaining the information he needs. For Snape to go undercover under him, Occlumency was needed to ward off and deceive Voldemort. How many plans Snape and Dumbledore secretly planned, including delivering all kinds of true and false intelligence, including secretly helping Harry find the Sword of Griffindor and destroying a Horcrux, including finally killing the one with only one year of life. Dumbledore to gain Voldemort's ultimate trust. One of these made Voldemort aware that the whole plan would be in vain, but Voldemort just didn't notice it. First, it was because Voldemort was too conceited, and secondly, Snape's Occlumency was too powerful. So I can't accept a single adaptation in the movie anyway. At Dumbledore's request, Snape taught Harry Potter Occlumency to ward off telepathy between Harry and Voldemort. During a rehearsal in class, Harry Potter accidentally hacked into Snape's brain and read some memories of Snape and his father's holiday. This is precisely the most secret and most reluctant plot in the heart of the arrogant Snape. It was actually picked up by a rookie during class. Could such Snape be able to defend against Voldemort? The description in the book is acceptable to me. It was Harry who was dishonest and peeped at Snape's memory hidden in the Pensieve. In fact, Snape's undercover is very difficult to do. Perhaps the best secrecy is not Occlumency, but forgetting yourself. He used to do that, so he became a Death Eater. So he can't completely forget, he can't forget his love for Lily, he can only add to his pain, but he wants to protect Lily's orphans , can only use Occlumency to seal up his memory. The final title mentions the adaptation of the film, and there is another place that I am not satisfied with. The final battle is missing an important plot. In the book, when Harry Potter came back to life, Harry, who already knew everything, told the truth about Snape to Voldemort's showdown. In the final moments of the decisive battle, the truth of Snape was told, which was definitely a heavy blow to the conceited Voldemort. But it's not at all in the movie, it's been deleted. When Harry returned to Hogwarts Castle with the Order of the Phoenix, Professor McGonagall beat back the "pseudo-headmaster" Snape, and when Snape turned into black smoke and jumped out of the window to exit Hogwarts , is called "coward" by people who don't know the truth. What kind of grievance is this? Zhang Zizhong is called "traitor", so he can only clarify by death. This is not an insult that ordinary people can endure. For an undercover "upline" who can only prove his innocence and died at his own hands, this is almost an unrecognizable grievance. Maybe Snape doesn't care anymore, but the author must give the reader an explanation. Later books, borrowed from Harry's mouth, justified Snape, he was not a coward, but a hero who was braver than any other. In the movie, there is a plot that gives Snape the title of "coward", but the last part of the name is missing. If you don't give Snape his name when he's not climaxing, then the climax is not at all pleasant. After reading the entire "Harry Potter", I was deeply moved by the character of Severus. Although it took a lot of writing to express my dissatisfaction, it did not hinder my high evaluation of the "Harry Potter" book. It made me hate "Pink Control" Umbridge so much, and it also made me appreciate "Strange" so much. Milo" Snape, it is not only a children's literature, but also a masterpiece of world literature. "Harry Potter" movies are actually good, especially the actor Alan Rickman who plays Snape, I think he is Snape. The final title mentions the adaptation of the film, and there is another place that I am not satisfied with. The final battle is missing an important plot. In the book, when Harry Potter came back to life, Harry, who already knew everything, told the truth about Snape to Voldemort's showdown. In the final moments of the decisive battle, the truth of Snape was told, which was definitely a heavy blow to the conceited Voldemort. But it's not at all in the movie, it's been deleted. When Harry returned to Hogwarts Castle with the Order of the Phoenix, Professor McGonagall beat back the "pseudo-headmaster" Snape, and when Snape turned into black smoke and jumped out of the window to exit Hogwarts , is called "coward" by people who don't know the truth. What kind of grievance is this? Zhang Zizhong is called "traitor", so he can only clarify by death. This is not an insult that ordinary people can endure. For an undercover "upline" who can only prove his innocence and died at his own hands, this is almost an unrecognizable grievance. Maybe Snape doesn't care anymore, but the author must give the reader an explanation. Later books, borrowed from Harry's mouth, justified Snape, he was not a coward, but a hero who was braver than any other. In the movie, there is a plot that gives Snape the title of "coward", but the last part of the name is missing. If you don't give Snape his name when he's not climaxing, then the climax is not at all pleasant. After reading the entire "Harry Potter", I was deeply moved by the character of Severus. Although it took a lot of writing to express my dissatisfaction, it did not hinder my high evaluation of the "Harry Potter" book. It made me hate "Pink Control" Umbridge so much, and it also made me appreciate "Strange" so much. Milo" Snape, it is not only a children's literature, but also a masterpiece of world literature. "Harry Potter" movies are actually good, especially the actor Alan Rickman who plays Snape, I think he is Snape. The final title mentions the adaptation of the film, and there is another place that I am not satisfied with. The final battle is missing an important plot. In the book, when Harry Potter came back to life, Harry, who already knew everything, told the truth about Snape to Voldemort's showdown. In the final moments of the decisive battle, the truth of Snape was told, which was definitely a heavy blow to the conceited Voldemort. But it's not at all in the movie, it's been deleted. When Harry returned to Hogwarts Castle with the Order of the Phoenix, Professor McGonagall beat back the "pseudo-headmaster" Snape, and when Snape turned into black smoke and jumped out of the window to exit Hogwarts , is called "coward" by people who don't know the truth. What kind of grievance is this? Zhang Zizhong is called "traitor", so he can only clarify by death. This is not an insult that ordinary people can endure. For an undercover "upline" who can only prove his innocence and died at his own hands, this is almost an unrecognizable grievance. Maybe Snape doesn't care anymore, but the author must give the reader an explanation. Later books, borrowed from Harry's mouth, justified Snape, he was not a coward, but a hero who was braver than any other. In the movie, there is a plot that gives Snape the title of "coward", but the last part of the name is missing. If you don't give Snape his name when he's not climaxing, then the climax is not at all pleasant. After reading the entire "Harry Potter", I was deeply moved by the character of Severus. Although it took a lot of writing to express my dissatisfaction, it did not hinder my high evaluation of the "Harry Potter" book. It made me hate "Pink Control" Umbridge so much, and it also made me appreciate "Strange" so much. Milo" Snape, it is not only a children's literature, but also a masterpiece of world literature. "Harry Potter" movies are actually good, especially the actor Alan Rickman who plays Snape, I think he is Snape. After reading the entire "Harry Potter", I was deeply moved by the character of Severus. Although it took a lot of writing to express my dissatisfaction, it did not hinder my high evaluation of the "Harry Potter" book. It made me hate "Pink Control" Umbridge so much, and it also made me appreciate "Strange" so much. Milo" Snape, it is not only a children's literature, but also a masterpiece of world literature. "Harry Potter" movies are actually good, especially the actor Alan Rickman who plays Snape, I think he is Snape. After reading the entire "Harry Potter", I was deeply moved by the character of Severus. Although it took a lot of writing to express my dissatisfaction, it did not hinder my high evaluation of the "Harry Potter" book. It made me hate "Pink Control" Umbridge so much, and it also made me appreciate "Strange" so much. Milo" Snape, it is not only a children's literature, but also a masterpiece of world literature. "Harry Potter" movies are actually good, especially the actor Alan Rickman who plays Snape, I think he is Snape.
View more about Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 reviews
