Take the last episode as an example, if Snape hadn't met Harry before he died, then this guy's life would have no meaning. Who would bet his innocence on the ultimate coincidence? And why did he kill Dumbledore to gain Voldemort's trust? Incredible.
The biggest flaw in the entire Harry Potter series is that the bad guys are not strong enough, and the good guys are so powerful but can't use their power. The enchantment set up by a few teachers can resist so many enemies, and Voldemort's hero eventually died at the hands of an ordinary mother. The villain does not have a particularly eye-catching role, and basically has no impression. In other words, Voldemort is a big boss, but he is not very strong. At first, his combat power is basically 0 without humanoid form. Later, he was revived and started to be very weak. Finally, he started to be awesome, and his defense power dropped because of the successive destruction of Horcruxes. was terminated. In fact, Dumbledore can unite the relevant forces to deal with him while he is alive, and there is no need to ask Potter to take over this mess.
If it is really moving, it is also the emotion that has been nurtured by the time spent in company for so many years. Seeing the last adult Porter returning to King's Cross Station with his children, probably many people will recall the time when they first came into contact with this work. Feeling - after so many years, the work has grown as old as we have! I have to admit that the Harry Potter series is a great work, but overall it feels anticlimactic.
PS: While watching the movie, the more I watched, the more I felt that Voldemort resembled Feng Xiaogang!
View more about Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 reviews
