In the early stage of the film, Rance's trust in the law, in the mid-term, Rance began to practice guns, and finally, in the name of a lawyer, Rance became the governor. But all of this has Tom's help behind it. Obviously, Tom is a ranger, the embodiment of loyalty. Rance killed the villain (thought by outsiders). From a moral point of view, he is a hero, and from a legal point of view, he should be hanged.
The film has everything that a western film has, masked robbery, marksmanship, and duels. However, just like the total score composition I wrote, the format is the same, but the inside is a jug. The director never gave a clear answer. In the end Tom is alone for a lifetime. Is the director's sigh of justice or his contempt for justice?
View more about The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance reviews
