First of all, let me talk about the biggest theme of this film, which is the arbitrariness and lack of fact-finding of the jurors. Without going into the facts first, people are always accustomed to seek what seems to be an absolute fact, and are accustomed to listen. In the first decision, we found that everyone did not say why the child must be guilty. The standard they judged was "If he killed someone, he should be in the electric chair. Is this still questionable?" When the only person pointed out the specific loopholes in the facts , they'll be red-faced and yell that you're talking nonsense. The second we found that the witness testimony of the specific support of the case people will take for granted that it exists reasonably, such as the old man who heard the voice and the woman who saw the murder scene, the jurors will not deduce the rationality of its existence. We will find that the first person to stand up and say not guilty is not so otherworldly thinking, but not everyone here. They didn't say not guilty until the testimony in support of the child's overturn was deduced to be unreasonable. This is yet another difficulty in accepting a fact that lacks a situational questioning of the fact. To be rude is to say hilariously. Use your own cognition to make judgments based on how you think it is, and this is not called judgment. This is called the exchange of opinions and prejudice. Let's look at their prejudice and herd mentality. The first and biggest feature is their change of opinion on a show of hands. There is a thing in communication science called the spiral of silence. The public voice will eliminate the small voice and become the mainstream. The first time the jurors raised their hands to vote, some wanted to be not guilty. When they found out that they would be a minority, they no longer dared to stand up. So I hope to join this part of the public, lose self-judgment and instill myself with public opinions, and get gregarious. The second is the sloppiness and recklessness of the jurors, and we found that they kept saying how much time we had to spend on this. Still bragging about your work, networking, and playing Sudoku during the discussion. Even the guy who was in a hurry to go to the ball said not guilty in order to finish early. "Why do you think you have such a right to play other people's lives as a child's play" Prejudice and irrationality You think you are an outsider and can see through , we don't know how many wrongful convictions have occurred like this
View more about 12 Angry Men reviews
