Re-watching "Bing on the City" is of course not as good-looking as it was 20 years ago. This piece is naturally not standing on both sides of the confrontation, only standing on oneself, and on the side of love, the meaning and position of making love in a crowd is more obvious. But still the same problem, snipers should still be lonely and low-key, not lined up in a row like "Snipers", like shooting a target. If you feel motionless, someone will raise their hands and ask for relief. Zhang Yimou's handling is equivalent to turning the sharpshooter in the United States into the Soviet cadre played by Fiennes. He will capture the heroine because of jealousy and jealousy, so that the hero can be messed up, and even take the initiative to "turn in". In this case, it really becomes the red part of the story of "Hero", cheating and cannibalism. This kind of wildness in the countryside is really far from the pride of a sniper or a knight. As for whether "Sniper" seeks a breakthrough within the established range, at least in my opinion, when a high-level, or an imaginary high-level, sets the rules and boundaries by yourself, and then opens a back door by yourself, or a dog hole for people to drill, then is the most boring, even shameless. If nothing else, since the emphasis has always been on equality and collectiveness, if it really is a so-called breakthrough, then at least the latecomers, regardless of their identity or qualifications, can follow and make breakthroughs. If at this point, they cannot achieve everyone. Equality, what is the meaning of this slogan? And at this point, movies like "I'm Not the God of Medicine" are like this, and "Sniper" should be the same, although I haven't even seen the latter's so-called "breakthrough".
View more about Enemy at the Gates reviews
