, you know, justice is very important. Both sides of the war beg God for support. God is fair and merciful and will surely hold justice and stand on their side.
Justice and morality have no blade or nuclear radiation; physically, they cannot hurt a single vellus hair; mentally, they make the owner energetic and make the guilty person feel weak. It is a more terrifying spiritual weapon.
Therefore, the victor must have justice, and those who win the hearts of the people will win the world, they said. To win the world, you must win the hearts of the people.
All theories, from the democracy and equality of capitalists, to the working class of Ma's, must be in power. They are full of blood and are full of justice and morality.
Sadly, there is no weighing instrument, and there has never been a fair weight and measure to examine and judge who is righteous and who is evil.
Those who hold the Koran are angrily against those who hold the Bible, because the land of the Arabs is occupied by Westerners who hold the Bible; those who hold the Bible derives equality and freedom from the Sermon on the Mount, and thus was born Modern technology; while the Koran maintains the rule of the Middle Ages, women are veiled, inferior to others, and regard equality and freedom as false gods; the backward medieval dogma can never reach the freedom and democracy of scientific and technological evidence, which is undoubtedly ignorant and sad. However, how much justice can Westerners who possess other people's resources have?
Does the procedure determine justice, or does the result determine justice? Kill one and save five; or save five and kill one. You know, in the university, they discussed this topic repeatedly. Like a scholar in the Middle Ages, chattering endlessly; how many angels can stand on the tip of a needle? This question seems ridiculous, but. If God exists, then angels also exist naturally; there can be several angels on a needle, which is related to the natural attributes of angels. The humility of angels and people determines whether you can ascend to heaven. If God exists, the needle-pointed angel is still so ridiculous.
In the past few years, good films have emerged one after another. In such noisy films as 72 hours of anti-terrorism, you can occasionally see treasures such as the Dark Knight and the strategic secret service team. Blessed are those who like to be shocked. They can watch for seventy-two hours; because justice and morality are clear at a glance, it is so easy to choose the right one, choose the right one and win.
Or, you can also look at the strategic secret service team. It's just that there are more doubts, and no one is right. There is no party.
The procedure is incorrect and the result is incorrect. It's not about the choice, it's not about who did it right or did it wrong.
For their faith, Muslims stood up and sacrificed themselves, looked at their oppressors face to face, had the courage to bear the consequences, and scored a moral point.
In order to achieve their goals, terrorists dare to risk the world by blackmailing them with nuclear bombs, reducing their morals by one point.
The land of the weak is invaded, and there is no weapon to confront the strong. Using guerrilla warfare to defeat the strong enemy, justice gets a point.
The backward medieval doctrines oppress the human heart, let ignorance guide believers, and reduce justice by one point.
All kinds of calculations and calculations, like onions, are peeled off layer by layer in the movie. Whether it is a terrorist or a seemingly just official.
But justice and morality are mathematical problems. You can add, subtract, subtract, multiply, and divide. If the result of the formula is a positive number, it is justice; is a negative number an evil? Is dichotomy justice victorious again?
Is torture justice, but is it justice to ignore torture and cost millions of people? Or, can keeping the procedure fair and pure can make the result better?
Damn, maybe the fist should decide everything. Power comes from the barrel of a gun, and the winner is always right, and history is written by the winner.
Wait a second, the cruel ruler often loses everything because of cruelty after victory. Darwinism in politics does not believe that having claws always has everything. The lion will die too, and the ant will rule on the head of the dead lion.
It all depends on your perspective. The problem is always the same. Simple to watch, this is a good movie with twists and turns and suspense. Bad Muslims love their children, and good people (including officials) will do something wrong for the sake of their careers. The terrorist committed suicide, and the female FBI with a moral bottom line adopted the child. Many people show kindness in movies, but occasionally evil.
Or, another perspective: the impact of two cultures. Both Muslims and Christians follow their conscience and bottom line. Unfortunately, the two sides recognize the conflict. The one who should be cursed is the man who wrote the scriptures, if the old camel dealer in the desert didn't dictate mantras and made golden rules. But maybe it was Jesus' fault, how dare that little carpenter claim to be the son of God.
Or, another perspective: God created man, using clay and the breath of God, the most filthy and holiest. Human nature originally has both good and evil, and justice and morality, both sides of the war, who owns it, are not pure.
If human beings are good angels, they cannot survive in the vicious forest; human beings are completely devils and kill each other and have long been extinct.
It is not difficult to examine justice, and there is no total justice and evil. Arab terrorists act evil, but this evil comes from Western invaders. Western invaders are not all demons. The Arabs in the Middle Ages did not possess resources just because they stood on top of natural resources; whoever can own the air, who can own the blue sky, the resources belong to the whole world and all mankind.
You know, that hoarse and self-proclaimed justice is often a liar. The revolution strangled her children, and evil moved by the slogan of freedom. This is often the case in the world. The evil comes from another evil, which is retribution in circles. The source of the beginning has long been forgotten and cannot be measured.
Justice and morality come from conscience. Addition, subtraction, multiplication and division may be able to calculate the best interests, but it cannot balance the conscience of all people.
For H in the film, killing children can save millions of people, and killing is his conscience; for terrorists, suicide is used to seal and let bombs explode to save Arabs, suicide is his conscience; for FBI, to maintain the constitution, It is her conscience to keep the law from being abused and to guarantee the innocent. The best result does not equal moral correctness. That is her conscience.
The consciences of the three different positions are all derived from their own morals and their own righteous judgments. If God exists, there is no distinction between black and white or race. It is not because there are more people on which side, the prayers are louder, and the benefits are higher, so it will be biased towards which side. The rule of the majority is not always correct.
One day, there will be a certain alien race, driving a spaceship, upholding a certain alien morality, to judge the existence of human beings. Today’s public ethics class in the school is right, and how many lives can be saved for North American Indians? You know, this is a big bet, far from a boring topic discussed in the school, even for Yale and Harvard. After all, the west will be developed. Morality and justice are just theories after survival.
Some people lose, some win, some live for faith, and some die for faith; bet everything, roll the dice, just to survive the next time.
View more about Unthinkable reviews
