Ryota Kaneko

Destany 2022-04-21 09:02:51

After 2010, I thought it would be difficult to invest such a large amount of money in a war film. The grandeur of this film is exactly the same as the explosion of "Pearl Harbor". This film shows the intensity of the war more from the first perspective lens, which makes the audience feel that the...

Monica 2022-01-05 08:01:53

Summary

Ten times better than "Pearl Harbor", no one is deliberately sensational like "Pearl Harbor", and there is no ridiculous plot like one-handed dismantling a Gundam. Is there personal heroism? Yes, but this is also the personal heroism under the coordination of the system. After leaving the...

Ansley 2022-01-05 08:01:53

My most photographed movie

Trevion 2022-01-05 08:01:53

Due to budgetary reasons, the special effects are very shabby, and poverty is visible to the naked eye. Based on Emmerich's resume, some creative big scenes should be shot, but they are very modest or point to the end, and I can see a feeling of powerlessness. Therefore, the director focused on the literary drama, but wrote a lot and spread it widely, but it was not refined at all, and the arrangement was still chaotic. In many places, there is no need to write about it, especially from the perspective of the Japanese army (the Japanese army is quite elegant and easy-going, it is really the Emperor’s Legion). To be honest, as a quasi-Chinese film, Roland Emmerich might as well try to film stories about the Chinese theater. I always get tired of watching the US military fight the Japanese devils. And now it’s easy to lose money in war films, and it might be possible to recoup the cost of filming in the Chinese theater.