-
Axel 2021-10-20 18:58:52
I know this is a great movie, but I didn't expect it to be so...
-
Ron 2021-10-20 18:58:47
Stupid B, I even read the introduction first, but the film itself felt very artificial during the viewing...
-
Alford 2021-10-20 18:58:45
Rashomon, there is only explanation, no...
-
Magnolia 2021-10-20 18:58:41
Democracy, humanity, reason, principle. Reasonable...
-
Dion 2021-10-20 18:58:37
The law dog really has a deep understanding of what democracy is and what justice is. You will have your own answers in your...
-
Haley 2021-10-20 18:58:37
Looking at the electric fans and luxurious toilets of the 1950s, I just want to sigh the "evil...
12 Angry Men Comments
-
Brandy 2022-04-22 07:01:02
Not guilty
I happened to be reading social psychology recently, and the conformity and prejudice mentioned in the book are reflected in the movie at a glance. If it were me, I don't know if I would have the courage to say not guilty after eleven people have finished saying Guilty. The answer may be no...
-
Lexus 2022-04-21 09:01:11
Good Marketing Case
An excellent case of the "Jedi Rebound", the 1957 movie, people are already in the popularization of law, think about the gap between China and the United States, you can know what human rights are, a long struggle. Perhaps the sense of joy is not particularly strong because there are some reports...
-
Juror #2: It's hard to put into words. I just think he's guilty. I thought it was obvious from the word, 'Go'. Nobody proved otherwise.
Juror #8: Nobody has to prove otherwise. The burden of proof is on the prosecution. The defendant doesn't even have to open his mouth. That's in the Constitution.
-
Juror #8: Look, there was one alleged eye witness to this killing. Someone else claims he heard the killing, saw the boy run out afterwards and there was a lot of circumstantial evidence. But, actually, those two witnesses were the entire case for the prosecution. Supposing they're wrong?
Juror #12: What do you mean, supposing they're wrong? What's the point of having witnesses at all?
Juror #8: Could they be wrong?
Juror #12: What are you trying to say? Those people sat on the stand under oath.
Juror #8: They're only people. People make mistakes. Could they be wrong?
Juror #12: Well, no, I don't think so.
Juror #8: Do you 'know' so?
Juror #12: Oh, come on. Nobody can know a thing like that. This isn't an exact science.
Juror #8: That's right, it isn't.
